Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by STONELEY, R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The transmission of Rayleigh waves across Eurasia^*

DEPARTMENT OF GEODESY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND.

Abstract

The problem of the propagation of Rayleigh waves in a double surface layer, although mathematically tractable, would involve very lengthy computations, scarcely justified by the rather inaccurate data available.

An approximate treatment by "Rayleigh's principle" gives, for any postulated ratio of the thicknesses of the layers, an overestimate of these thicknesses which needs reduction by 10 or 15 per cent. Applied to W. Rohrbach's data on the velocities of transmission (i.e., the group velocities) of Rayleigh waves of known period, this method yields values which are consistent with those previously obtained for Eurasia from Love waves.

For a single uniform granitic layer of thickness T₁ resting on uniform ultrabasic material of great depth the Rayleigh-wave velocities from a track from the Kwen Lun Mountains to Göttingen give T₁ = 39.4 km., without use of the Rayleigh approximation. This may be compared with the estimate of 34.6 km. obtained on slightly differing hypotheses from Love waves.

If the granitic layer is underlain by a uniform layer of basic rock of thickness T₂, some hypothesis must, in our present state of knowledge, be made concerning the ratio T₂: T₁. For Rayleigh waves the Kwen Lun earthquake gives, on the two hypotheses T₂ = T₁ and T₂ = ₂T₁, the values ₂7 km. and 19 km. respectively for T₁. Reduced by, say, 15 per cent these values are ₂3 km. and 16 km., which may be compared with the estimates ₂₂.1 km. and 17.6 km. derived on the same data from Love waves.

For a shock in Eastern Bengal the Rayleigh waves (both vertical and E-W components) give 30 km. and 25 km. on the two hypotheses, that is, "reduced values" of 25.5 km. and 21 km., which exceed the Love-wave estimates of 22.1 km. and 17.6 km. quoted above. However, these tracks cross the Himalayas and the excess values are not surprising.

There is evidently scope for further investigations along these lines.

Footnotes

^* Manuscript received for publication April 7, 1952.