Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1953; v. 43; no. 4; p. 311-329
© 1953 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DONN, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by BLAIK, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A study and evaluation of the tripartite seismic method of locating hurricanes*

WILLIAM L. DONN and MAURICE BLAIK

LAMONT GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY(COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY)

Abstract

Tripartite records from the U. S. Navy stations at Bermuda, Cherry Point, and Miami were studied in detail for the 1950 hurricane season. Following a discussion of the theoretical error expected in this study, the results of single and average azimuth computation are given. Since the error between computed and observed storm azimuths exceeds the theoretical by a considerable amount, a study of the causes of the errors was undertaken. The difficulties are considered to result from instrumentations and procedure, lack of wave coherence at the three elements of the tripartite net, and refraction or multiple wave paths.

A large range in velocities was observed, with indications that the lower values are the more reliable. Selection on a velocity basis gives somewhat better success than averaging all readings over the chosen interval of time. Suggestions for improvement of the instrumentation program are given.

Footnotes

* Manuscript received for publication April 29, 1952.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. R. SANFORD, A. G. CARAPETIAN, and L. T. LONG
High frequency microseisms from a known source
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1968; 58(1): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. BLAIK and W. L. DONN
Microseism ground motion at Palisades and Weston
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1954; 44(4): 597 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America