Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1959; v. 49; no. 2; p. 179-191
© 1959 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUKE, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by LEEDS, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Soil conditions and damage in the Mexico earthquake of July 28, 1957

C. MARTIN DUKE and DAVID J. LEEDS

DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,, LOS ANGELES 24, CALIFORNIA

Abstract

A report is given of observations of the effects of soil conditions on damage in Mexico City and Guerrero State in the earthquake of July 28, 1957. An isoseismal map is presented which identifies anomalies in intensity distribution which appear to be closely related to local geology and soil conditions. Comparison is made between Mexico City, 170 miles from the epicenter and founded on the deep alluvium of Lake Texcoco, and several cities and villages 60 miles from the epicenter, founded on firmer deposits or granite.

Mexico City suffered Modified Mercalli intensities of VII and IV, respectively, in that part of the lake-bed area where tall buildings stand, and on the more compact formations. Of the several cities 60 miles from the epicenter, all suffered intensity V or less except Chilpancingo, where the intensity was VII to VIII. Chilpancingo rests on deep unconsolidated deposits; the other places are on rock or shallower unconsolidated deposits.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. DOBRY, I. M. IDRISS, and E. NG
Duration characteristics of horizontal components of strong-motion earthquake records
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1487 - 1520.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. DOBRY, I. OWEIS, and A. URZUA
Simplified procedures for estimating the fundamental period of a soil profile
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1976; 66(4): 1293 - 1321.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America