Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WITKIND, I. J. Articles by FRASER, G. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Geologic features of the earthquake at Hebgen Lake, Montana, August 17, 1959

NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS BRANCH U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO

Abstract

In the epicentral region of the Hebgen Lake earthquake, Montana, late Cenozoic structures marked by tension are superimposed on Laramide structures marked by compression. During the earthquake, several large normal faults northeast of Hebgen Lake, and many small faults and monoclines south of it, were reactivated, and a very large area was abruptly dropped and warped.

New fault scarps are as high as 20 feet. They are mostly in unconsolidated or weakly coherent material but certainly reflect displacements of the underlying bedrock. Offsets produced by refraction of faults, which are steeper in surficial material than in bedrock, and by various types of slumping, generally result in surficial scarps higher than true fault displacements.

Subsidence amounted to as much as 22 feet in the lake basin, as proved by releveling of bench marks by the Coast and Geodetic Survey and by shoreline measurements around Hebgen Lake. Parts of the basin subsided differentially, warping the lake bed and creating a gigantic long-lived seiche. Depth-sounding traverses of the lake recorded warping but gave no indication of major faulting of the lake bottom.

A part of the Madison Valley, west of Hebgen Lake, also subsided, though not as much, and a segment of the Madison Range fault was reactivated. At least part of the highway through Madison River Canyon, which cuts directly across the Madison Range between Hebgen Lake and Madison Valley, subsided also; one group of geologists regards this subsidence as tectonic, and considers the entire range, for which there are otherwise no positive data, to have subsided between Hebgen Lake and Madison Valley. In this view, an eastward trending syncline has been propagated across the northwest-trending Madison Range. Another group considers the subsidence in Madison River Canyon to be due in part to compaction and slumping, and the Madison Range to have changed little in altitude. The pattern of deformation appears to them as the uneven subsidence of two northwest-trending basins, one on either side of the Madison Range.

The earthquake caused widespread slumping and sliding of the surficial mantle; the huge Madison Slide killed 26 people. An old earthflow was reactivated and moved 100 feet or more in the month following the earthquake.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. BARRIENTOS, R. S. STEIN, and S. N. WARD Comparison of the 1959 Hebgen Lake, Montana and the 1983 Borah Peak, Idaho, earthquakes from geodetic observations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1987; 77(3): 784 - 808. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. RYALL, D. B. SLEMMONS, and L. D. GEDNEY Seismicity, tectonism, and surface faulting in the western United States during historic time Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1966; 56(5): 1105 - 1135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. F. EVISON Earthquakes and faults Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1963; 53(5): 873 - 891. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. WIEGEL and D. CAMOTIM Model study of oscillations of Hebgen Lake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1962; 52(2): 273 - 277. [PDF]