Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1963; v. 53; no. 6; p. 1263-1271
© 1963 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GALLI O., C.
Right arrow Articles by Saint-Amand, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Relation between geology and the effects of the earthquakes of May 1960 in the city of Castro and vicinity, Chiloé

CARLOS GALLI O., JOAQUIN SANCHEZ R. and Pierre Saint-Amand

INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES GEOLOGICAS, SANTIAGO, Chile
US NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION, CHINA LAKE, CALIF.

Abstract

The rocks and sediments of the region have been divided into eight units: metamorphic rocks of pre-Mesozoic age, composed of mica schists; volcanic rocks, columnar andesites, tentatively assigned to the Tertiary, that outcrop in a small area to the west of Castro; fluvioglacial deposits, uncemented sands and gravels that in almost all cases overlie three terraces of Pleistocene age that are indicated on the map as morphologic units; slope deposits, friable hybrid material neither classified nor consolidated, that cover one of the most dangerous areas in which to construct; beach deposits—unconsolidated coastal sediments; unconsolidated alluvial sediments distributed in the beds of rivers and in the river deltas presently in formation; and deposits of artificial fill, gravels, sands, bricks, trash, etc.

Damage to structures is clearly related to the geology. In areas of artificial fill and of slope deposits, catastrophic destruction was caused almost exclusively by geologic and morphologic factors. Some areas with a favorable morphology, such as the intermediate and high terraces, are formed of sound material, such as metamorphic rocks, and had little or no damage.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America