Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1964; v. 54; no. 1; p. 151-160
© 1964 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OLIVER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Propagation of PL waves across the United States

JACK OLIVER

LAMONT GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK

Abstract

The two large Mexican earthquakes of May 1962 excited PL waves which were unusually well recorded by long period seismographs at a number of U. S. stations of the standardized network of the USC&GS. These data were used to make the first direct determinations of attenuation and of phase velocity dispersion of PL waves in the crust-mantle wave guide. When the effects of dispersion and geometrical spreading are removed, the Q for PL waves in the period range of 35 to 50 seconds is about 10, in contrast to a Q of about 150 for Rayleigh waves of the same wave length. There is a clear dependence of PL dispersion on crustal structure, with data for western profiles indicating crustal thicknesses greater than those for eastern profiles. Such information is complementary to information on dispersion of other types of surface waves and to seismic refraction and reflection data and can provide additional constraint on models of the crust-mantle system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. A. W. HADDON
Computation of synthetic seismograms in layered earth models using leaking modes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1225 - 1248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A.-B. K. IBRAHIM
Leaking and normal modes as a means to determine crust-upper mantle structure for different paths to Sweden
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1969; 59(4): 1695 - 1712.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. CHANDER, L. E. ALSOP, and J. OLIVER
On the synthesis of shear-coupled PL waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1968; 58(6): 1849 - 1877.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. S. SU and J. DORMAN
The use of leaking modes in seismogram interpretation and in studies of crust-mantle structure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1965; 55(6): 989 - 1021.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America