Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1969; v. 59; no. 1; p. 131-146
© 1969 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LONG, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by BERG, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Transmission and attenuation of the primary seismic wave, 100 to 600 km

LELAND TIMOTHY LONG* and JOSEPH W. BERG, JR.{ddagger}

DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, CORVALLIS, OREGON

Abstract

The observed frequency dependence of attenuation can be used to calculate Q values which are independent of losses due to geometrical spreading or to reflections at boundaries. The observed apparent rates of attenuation in terms of Qap along two refraction lines were computed to be 169 ± 42 at 5 cps in eastern New Mexico and 116 ± 38 at 4 cps in Nevada. The geometrical spreading factor which satisfied the observed amplitudes and both of the observed Qap values is r–0.5. Thus, the primary seismic wave at epicentral distances of 100 to 600 km would appear to be a continuous refraction (direct wave). Attenuation is the dominant factor in determining the waveform, spectral content, and amplitude of the first arrival. A Q of 100 implies a functional relation between frequency and distance which shows that amplitudes at frequencies above 4 cps at 150 km and above 3 cps at 400 km will be less than one tenth the peak spectral amplitude and cannot be reliably related to the source.

Footnotes

* Now with Georgia Institute of Technology.

{ddagger} Now with National Academy of Sciences, Committee of Seismology, 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washington, D. C. 20418.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. W. KING and W. W. HAYS
Comparison of seismic attenuation in northern Utah with attenuation in four other regions of the Western United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1977; 67(3): 781 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. C. F. STEWART
A magnitude scale for local earthquakes in South Australia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1975; 65(5): 1267 - 1285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. E. O'NEILL and J. H. HEALY
Determination of source parameters of small earthquakes from P-wave rise time
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1973; 63(2): 599 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. F. VEITH and G. E. CLAWSON
Magnitude from short-period P-wave data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1972; 62(2): 435 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. W. HAYS
Amplitude and frequency characteristics of elastic wave types generated by the underground nuclear detonation, Boxcar
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1969; 59(6): 2283 - 2293.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America