Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LAHR, J. Articles by POMEROY, P. W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The foreshock-aftershock sequence of the March 20 1966 earthquake in the Republic of Congo

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964
SEISMOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104

Abstract

The activity associated with the Congo earthquake of March 20 1966 (m_b = 6.5 to 7) was studied with emphasis on the time and magnitude distributions. The data were recorded at the Abéché, Chad, seismograph station operated by Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory. Over a period of about 70 days, 815 earthquakes with magnitude (m_b) greater than or equal to 3.3 were recorded, and they form the basis for this study.

The aftershocks are distributed with magnitude (m_b) according to the formula long n = a - bm with b = 1.05 ± 0.07 at the 95 per cent confidence limits. The foreshocks have b = 1.06 ± 0.35 at the 95 per cent confidence limits. These b values are in general agreement with b values derived from other aftershock sequences throughout the world.

Some authors have suggested that foreshocks may have a lower b value than background activity and that this difference might be used in earthquake prediction. In this paper, an evaluation is made of the limitations of this method of prediction. Assuming that such a difference in b values does exist, it is found that a closely spaced network of high-gain seismographs with wide dynamic range would be required to assure successful prediction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-H. Wang On the correlation of observed Gutenberg-Richter's b value and Omori's p value for aftershocks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 2008 - 2011. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. W. POMEROY, W. J. BEST, and T. V. MCEVILLY Test ban treaty verification with regional data--A review Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S89 - S129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. MCGARR and R. W. E. GREEN Microtremor sequences and tilting in a deep mine Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1978; 68(6): 1679 - 1697. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. MCGARR Dependence of magnitude statistics on strain rate Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1976; 66(1): 33 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. K. GUPTA, B. K. RASTOGI, and H. NARAIN Some discriminatory characteristics of earthquakes near the Kariba, Kremasta, and Koyna artificial lakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1972; 62(2): 493 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF]