|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
Abstract
The usual method of earthquake location which minimizes the sum of the squared residuals fails when the number of known arrival times is less than the number of location parameters. A generalized inverse matrix A
exists which yields a solution A
b of minimum Euclidean length to the condition equations Ax = b. (This situation often arises in geodesy.) Because the rank of A equals the number of rows, which is one less than the number of columns, the computation of the appropriate A
is very simple for only three stations. A worked example is given for the relocation of the trial position of an explosion using two stations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. H. THURBER Nonlinear earthquake location: Theory and examples Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1985; 75(3): 779 - 790. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. CACCAMO and G. NERI A new analytic procedure to determine hypocentral parameters of local seismic events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 655 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. UHRHAMMER Analysis of small seismographic station networks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 1369 - 1379. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |