Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1970; v. 60; no. 6; p. 1907-1919
© 1970 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAKER, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Determining magnitude from Lg

R. G. BAKER

4975 BROOKHILL PLACE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507

Abstract

In this paper, an empirical method is developed for determining magnitude of seismic events from the amplitude of Lg phases recorded at local to regional distances from the events. The data used were obtained from Long Range Seismic Measurements (LRSM) reports for 78 seismic events associated with explosions conducted the Atomic Energy Commission.

Preliminary investigation showed that magnitudes (M) calculated from Lg recordings had less scatter than body-wave magnitudes (m) reported for the same events and stations. A sixth-degree polynomial was found to give the best fit to log amplitude/period (A/T) values plotted as a function of epicentral distance. Amplitude-distance correction factors (Q) are presented in a chart.

Magnitudes from Lg were compared to the average unified magnitudes from LRSM shot reports. For 60 of 68 events, the standard deviation for M was less than that for m. The M values for all of the events were normalized to magnitude 5.0, and average residuals were found for 69 reporting stations. A plot of the residuals on a map indicates that they represent station corrections rather than azimuthal variations. Apparent station corrections (s) are presented for 23 LRSM stations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. W. POMEROY, W. J. BEST, and T. V. MCEVILLY
Test ban treaty verification with regional data--A review
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S89 - S129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. B. JONES, L. T. LONG, and J. H. MCKEE
Study of the attenuation and azimuthal dependence of seismic-wave propagation in the southeastern United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1977; 67(6): 1503 - 1513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. F. Howell Jr.
Precision of different varieties of magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1972; 62(3): 789 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America