Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1971; v. 61; no. 4; p. 1009-1012
© 1971 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAVAGE, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Radiation from supersonic faulting*

J. C. SAVAGE

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

The far-field radiation from a simple fault model is given by the radiation pattern associated with the appropriate strain nucleus (e.g., double couple) multiplied by a fault propagation factor. For a unilateral fault model the propagation factor is

Formula
where {xi} is the velocity of fault propagation, b is the fault slip, d is the fault width, {tau} = t – r0/c, r0 is the distance of the observer from the initial point of faulting, c is the velocity of the seismic wave, H({tau}) is the unit-step function, L is the length of the fault, and {psi} the angle between r0 and the direction of fault propagation. This representation is valid for both subsonic and supersonic fault propagation. The latter case is important because Weertman (1969) has recently shown that spontaneous faulting may propagate at supersonic velocities. Because the propagation factor is always positive, the nodal planes for the radiation are the same as for the appropriate strain nucleus. Finally, it is shown by the application of this equation that the radiation from a screw dislocation segment is represented by the double-couple nucleus, not the compensated linear-vector dipole nucleus as recently suggested by Knopoff and Randall (1970).

Footnotes

* Publication authorized by the Director, U. S. Geological Survey.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER
The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1978; 68(2): 283 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE
Strong-motion recordings of the California earthquake of April 18, 1906
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1977; 67(3): 561 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America