Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1972; v. 62; no. 4; p. 917-926
© 1972 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SINGH, S.
Right arrow Articles by SANFORD, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Statistical analysis of microearthquakes near Socorro New Mexico

SURENDRA SINGH and ALLAN R. SANFORD

DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCE NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY, SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 87801

Abstract

Five year of data for microearthquakes originating in a small volume of crust near Socorro, New Mexico were analyzed to determine the temporal behavior of (1) the average number of shocks per unit time, (2) the slope of the earthquake-frequency graph, and (3) the energy release. Additional studies were made to establish the distribution function for the times observed between successive earthquakes and the hazard function.

The temporal behavior of the mean number of shocks per unit time and the slope of the earthquake-frequency law were found to be quite erratic until the observation period was increased to 2 or more years (more than 200 shocks detected). Large numbers of shocks generally produced large energy release but the converse was not always true. The distribution function for the observed interarrival times between events was found to differ significantly from exponential and normal distribution functions. This observation, along with the behavior of the hazard function, indicates that the microearthquake sequence studied did not follow a Poisson process.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. F. SMALLEY Jr., J.-L. CHATELAIN, D. L. TURCOTTE, and R. PREVOT
A fractal approach to the clustering of earthquakes: Applications to the seismicity of the New Hebrides
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1368 - 1381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. SINGH
Geomagnetic activity and microearthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1533 - 1535.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. UDIAS and J. RICE
Statistical analysis of microearthquake activity near San Andreas geophysical observatory, Hollister, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1975; 65(4): 809 - 827.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. LOMNITZ
Poisson processes in earthquake studies
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1973; 63(2): 735 - 735.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America