Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1972; v. 62; no. 6; p. 1559-1578
© 1972 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OLSEN, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by VITOUSEK, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Long-period water-wave measurements for the MILROW and CANNIKIN nuclear explosions

KENNETH H. OLSEN, JOHN N. STEWART, JAMES E. MCNEIL and MARTIN J. VITOUSEK

LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO
DELCO ELECTRONICS, GOLETA, CALIFORNIA
HAWAII INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, HONOLULU, HAWAII

Abstract

Three types of high-resolution, ocean-bottom instruments were installed to monitor predicted low-amplitude, long-period water-wave activity associated with the MILROW and CANNIKIN underground nuclear explosions at Amchitka Island, Alaska. These instruments provided data on: (a) permanent vertical oceanfloor displacements in the expected generation region up to 15 km from surface zero, (b) wave propagation in deep water at ranges beyond 15 km, and (c) shoaling and nearshore effects at Amchitka and several other islands in the Aleutian chain.

For MILROW, permanent undersea displacements and propagating waves were unobservable above the natural long-period background level of ~ 1 cm (rms).

For CANNIKIN, areas of ocean-floor uplift were observed in both the Bering Sea and in the Pacific Ocean within 6 km of ground zero. Vertical displacements averaged several centimeters, with a more localized region showing 56 cm of uplift; these values seem to be consistent with results of land surveys on the island. Resonant oscillations having amplitudes up to 10 cm were induced in two bays on the Bering Sea coastline. The absence of observable tsunami-like waves at deep water instruments and at more distant islands suggests that much of the waterwave energy generated near CANNIKIN was constrained in edge-wave modes along the shallow offshore slope along the Bering Sea coastline of Amchitka, and was dissipated there.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America