Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1972; v. 62; no. 6; p. 1611-1619
© 1972 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALEWINE, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Theoretical and observed distance corrections for Rayleigh-wave magnitude

R. W. ALEWINE, III

SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91109
DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL AND PLANETARY SCIENCES

Abstract

Examination of the distance correction factor used in the widely accepted formula for surface-wave magnitude reveals that this empirically derived linear formula fails to give an accurate approximation to the theoretical nonlinear amplitude-distance relation for epicentral distances less than 15°. For epicentral distances greater than 15°, the empirical formula contains an implied oceanic-type energy-dissipation coefficient. When the original Gutenberg theoretical surface-wave magnitude formula with an appropriate continental energy-dissipation coefficient is applied to explosion data from the Nevada Test Site, a consistent surface-wave magnitude is obtained at all distances. A systematic method of normalizing Rayleigh-wave magnitudes obtained over different types of propagation paths is suggested. This normalization might provide a means for better separating natural events and explosions in the mb—Ms plots.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. K. YACOUB
"Instantaneous amplitudes": A new method to measure seismic magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1983; 73(5): 1345 - 1355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. J. GELLER and H. KANAMORI
Magnitudes of great shallow earthquakes from 1904 to 1952
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1977; 67(3): 587 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. A. GRANT and L. MANSINHA
Seismic magnitude from Fourier analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1977; 67(2): 453 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America