Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1974; v. 64; no. 4; p. 1049-1067
© 1974 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KNUDSON, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by MATTHIESEN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Strong-motion instrumental records of the Managua earthquake of December 23, 1972

C. F. KNUDSON, V. PEREZ and R. B. MATTHIESEN

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105

Abstract

The one accelerograph record obtained from the Managua earthquake of December 23, 1972 indicates that maximum ground acceleration was 0.39 g. Observations of severe damage to buildings in the center of the city and seismoscope records indicate that accelerations exceeding 0.5 g may have occurred within the zone of surface faulting. For the main shock, the horizontal components of the maximum response spectra show that the predominant periods are about 0.5, 1.0 and 1.7 sec; the vertical component shows high-velocity response for periods of 0.2 and 1.3 sec. Maximum response amplitudes for the main aftershock were in the same general period range as the main shock, although somewhat lower. For the main shock, levels of response in the horizontal direction of 40 to 60 cm/sec lasted between 4 and 8 cycles for many periods less than 1 sec. These levels of response, together with the high predominant periods of less than 1 sec, correlate well with observed damage to buildings.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America