Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1974; v. 64; no. 4; p. 1181-1188
© 1974 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AMBUTER, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by SOLOMON, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An event-recording system for monitoring small earthquakes

BRUCE P. AMBUTER and SEAN C. SOLOMON

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Abstract

To monitor small earthquakes on the ocean bottom or in remote areas on land, a seismic recording system should operate at low power for extended periods of time, should reproduce three components of ground motion with a large dynamic range, and should preferably be small and inexpensive. We describe such a system based on an event detector, which continuously surveys the background noise, sets a threshold, and triggers an inexpensive digital tape recorder when a seismic signal exceeds that threshold. Event recording offers the advantages over conventional continuous recording of more efficient use of storage capacity and easier later interpretation. A key element of the system is a continuously updated semiconductor buffer memory, which assures that first arrivals are included. Average power consumption is about a watt. The system design is easily adaptable to monitoring other types of rare events of unpredictable occurrence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J.-J. LEE and C. A. LANGSTON
Wave propagation in a three-dimensional circular basin
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1983; 73(6A): 1637 - 1653.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. R. EVANS and S. S. ALLEN
A teleseism-specific detection algorithm for single short-period traces
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1173 - 1186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. ALLEN
Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S225 - S242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. V. ALLEN
Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1521 - 1532.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. W. STEWART
Real-time detection and location of local seismic events in central California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1977; 67(2): 433 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. A. PROTHERO
A portable digital seismic recorder with event recording capability
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1976; 66(3): 979 - 985.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America