|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
TELEDYNE GEOTECH ALEXANDRIA LABORATORY, 314 MONTGOMERY STREET, ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA 22314
Abstract
The theory of automatic detection at a seismic array by means of an F-statistic is extended to a network of such arrays. The results are generally valid for detection using other statistics. The arrays may have equal or different expected signal-to-noise ratios. Two techniques are discussed: (1) the voting detector in which K out of M arrays must detect; K is determined to be optimum; (2) an incoherent detector which detects on the sum of the subarray detection outputs. For small variation of signal and noise amplitudes between arrays, the detectors are found to be nearly equal in detection capability.
If the standard deviation of log10 (signal/noise) is 0.3, the incoherent detector becomes substantially superior to the voting detector and approaches the capability of a perfect beam of well-correlated signals. This result is in agreement with the few available empirical data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. RINGDAL and T. Kvaerna A multi-channel processing approach to real time network detection, phase association, and threshold monitoring Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1989; 79(6): 1927 - 1940. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. BLANDFORD Seismic event discrimination Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S69 - S87. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. RINGDAL and E. S. HUSEBYE Application of arrays in the detection, location, and identification of seismic events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S201 - S224. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |