Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1976; v. 66; no. 4; p. 1375-1380
© 1976 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WIRTH, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by SHUMWAY, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Automatic seismic array and network detection

M. H. WIRTH, R. R. BLANDFORD and R. H. SHUMWAY

TELEDYNE GEOTECH ALEXANDRIA LABORATORY, 314 MONTGOMERY STREET, ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA 22314

Abstract

The theory of automatic detection at a seismic array by means of an F-statistic is extended to a network of such arrays. The results are generally valid for detection using other statistics. The arrays may have equal or different expected signal-to-noise ratios. Two techniques are discussed: (1) the voting detector in which K out of M arrays must detect; K is determined to be optimum; (2) an incoherent detector which detects on the sum of the subarray detection outputs. For small variation of signal and noise amplitudes between arrays, the detectors are found to be nearly equal in detection capability.

If the standard deviation of log10 (signal/noise) is 0.3, the incoherent detector becomes substantially superior to the voting detector and approaches the capability of a perfect beam of well-correlated signals. This result is in agreement with the few available empirical data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL and T. Kvaerna
A multi-channel processing approach to real time network detection, phase association, and threshold monitoring
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1989; 79(6): 1927 - 1940.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. R. BLANDFORD
Seismic event discrimination
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S69 - S87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL and E. S. HUSEBYE
Application of arrays in the detection, location, and identification of seismic events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S201 - S224.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America