Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BASHAM, P. W. Articles by BERRY, M. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Regional assessment of seismic risk in eastern Canada

EARTH PHYSICS BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MINES & RESOURCES, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, Canada

Abstract

Earthquake recurrence data for eastern Canada are used to derive estimates of probabilistic seismic risk at the low levels desirable for critical structures. The historical earthquake data (1661 to 1975) are employed to produce a seismicity model consisting of six zones of earthquake occurrence in the continental region and an isolated zone on the Grand Banks. Magnitude recurrence relations of the form

are derived for each of the zones. N₅(N M5) ranges from 0.0003 earthquakes per annum per 10⁴ km² in the general background zone to 0.08 in the confined Charlevoix Zone in the St. Lawrence Valley; ß values range from 1.5 to 2.4.

Seismic risk estimates (probability of exceedence of peak ground acceleration) are derived using the Cornell method of integrating risk contributions from the zones of earthquake occurrence. For sites within the larger zones of relatively low seismicity, e.g., Northern Appalachian Zone, with little influence from adjacent zones, the risk estimates near 10^–3 per annum are relatively insensitive to the uncertainties in the magnitude recurrence parameters; the maximum risk contribution comes from the lower magnitude earthquakes at the near distances. For sites within the range of influence of highly active areas such as the Charlevoix Zone, peak ground motions with risk of exceedence near 10^–3 per annum can vary by a factor of two depending on assumptions of the magnitude recurrence extrapolation and the maximum magnitudes. Constraints on the seismicity based on tentative geological correlations increase ground motion for sites near some active zones by factors of up to 1.5 at the same risk level compared to that derived from the model based only on historical earthquake distributions.

With the present knowledge of tectonic processes in eastern Canada, the uncertainties in magnitude recurrence extrapolations and maximum magnitudes, the assumptions about the temporal and spatial stationarity of earthquake zones, and the uncertainties on near-field effects and attenuation, seismic risk estimation at probabilities below 10^–3 per annum becomes increasingly deterministic.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ma, D. W. Eaton, and J. Adams Intraplate Seismicity of a Recently Deglaciated Shield Terrane: A Case Study from Northern Ontario, Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2828 - 2848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Gouin About the first earthquake reported in Canadian history Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 478 - 483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. S. HASEGAWA Attenuation of Lg waves in the Canadian Shield Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1569 - 1582. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. W. BASHAM, D. H. WEICHERT, F. M. ANGLIN, and M. J. BERRY New probabilistic strong seismic ground motion maps of Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1985; 75(2): 563 - 595. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. F. Howell Jr. On the variation of seismic hazard along the San Andreas fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 709 - 723. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. S. HASEGAWA Lg spectra of local earthquakes recorded by the Eastern Canada Telemetered Network and spectral scaling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1041 - 1061. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. ATKINSON and R. G. CHARLWOOD Uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment as a function of probability level: A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1225 - 1241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY Reply to G. M. Atkinson's "comments on 'attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada'" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1982; 72(5): 1771 - 1774. [PDF]

				H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 1943 - 1962. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. ANGLIN and G. BUCHBINDER Microseismicity in the mid-St. Lawrence Valley Charlevoix zone, Quebec Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1981; 71(5): 1553 - 1560. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. MOONEY and G. B. MOREY Seismic history of Minnesota and its geological significance Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1981; 71(1): 199 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. WEICHERT Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 1337 - 1346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. WEICHERT and W. G. MILNE On Canadian methodologies of probabilistic seismic risk estimation Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1979; 69(5): 1549 - 1566. [Abstract] [PDF]