Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1979; v. 69; no. 5; p. 1603-1622
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by KING, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evaluation of the relation between near-surface geological units and ground response in the vicinity of Long Beach, California

A. M. ROGERS, J. C. TINSLEY, W. W. HAYS and K. W. KING

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

Simulataneous recordings of Nevada Test Site nuclear events were made at sites underlain by alluvium in the Long Beach, California, area and at sites underlain by rock in the Palos Verdes and Pasadena areas. These data show peak-ground-velocity alluvium-to-rock ratios as large as 7 and spectral ratios as high as 11 in the period band from 0.2 to 6 sec. Comparison of the low-strain nuclear-explosion data and the San Fernando earthquake strong-motion data at three sites indicates that the alluvium-to-rock spectral ratios derived from the nuclear explosions are similar to those derived from the earthquake.

Significant trends exist in the short-period data, indicating higher ground response at sites underlain at the near-surface by materials that have high void ratios and lower ground response with increasing thickness of Quaternary deposits. These results suggest that the short-period response is primarily controlled both by near-surface low-velocity layers and by attenuation in the Quaternary sediments. Comparison of the data of this study with data collected in other areas indicates that the long-period response increase with either increasing depth to basement or with alluvium thickness, when this thickness is greater than 400 m. From previous theoretical studies and these results, ground response in the long-period band is related to those underlying geological structures and major velocity contrasts that control the development of surface waves.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Su, J. G. Anderson, and Y. Zeng
Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1411 - 1425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, A. Frankel, D. Carver, E. Cranswick, M. Meremonte, and J. Michael
First-generation site-response maps for the Los Angeles region based on earthquake ground motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 463 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Su, J. G. Anderson, J. N. Brune, and Y. Zeng
A comparison of direct S-wave and coda-wave site amplification determined from aftershocks of the Little Skull Mountain earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 1006 - 1018.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Hartzell, A. Leeds, A. Frankel, and J. Michael
Site response for urban Los Angeles using aftershocks of the Northridge earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1B): S168 - S192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. K. Saikia, D. S. Dreger, and D. V. Helmberger
Modeling of energy amplification recorded within Greater Los Angeles using irregular structure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1994; 84(1): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. SU., K. AKI, T. TENG, Y. ZENG, S. KOYANAGI, and K. MAYEDA
The relation between site amplification factor and surficial geology in central California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1992; 82(2): 580 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. K. SEN
Modeling of wave propagation in northern Los Angeles basin
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 751 - 768.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. M. BENZ and R. B. SMITH
Elastic-wave propagation and site amplification in the Salt Lake valley, Utah, from simulated normal faulting earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1988; 78(6): 1851 - 1874.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. M. ROGERS, R. D. BORCHERDT, P. A. COVINGTON, and D. M. PERKINS
A comparative ground response study near Los Angeles using recordings of Nevada nuclear tests and the 1971 San Fernando earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1984; 74(5): 1925 - 1949.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. KAGAMI, C. M. DUKE, G. C. LIANG, and Y. OHTA
Observation of 1- to 5-second microtremors and their application to earthquake engineering. Part II. Evaluation of site effect upon seismic wave amplification due to extremely deep soil deposits
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1982; 72(3): 987 - 998.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. M. ROGERS, J. C. TINSLEY, W. W. HAYS, and K. W. KING
Reply to H. R. Shifflett's "Comments on 'Evaluation of the relation between near-surface geological units and ground response in the vicinity of Long Beach, California'"
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1981; 71(2): 571 - 572.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America