Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1979; v. 69; no. 6; p. 1645-1670
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KANAMORI, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A semi-empirical approach to prediction of long-period ground motions from great earthquakes

HIROO KANAMORI

SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL AND PLANETARY SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125

Abstract

Predictability of long-period (1 sec or longer) ground motions generated by long strike-slip earthquakes such as the 1906 San Francisco and the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquakes, is investigated. Most large earthquakes are complex multiple events at this period range, and the resulting ground motion may be synthesized by convolving the ground motions of the individual event with the source function that describes the space-time history of the multiple shock sequence. Since it is not possible to predict deterministically the complexity of the rupture propagation, a semi-empirical approach was taken. For the ground motion from the individual events, the displacement records observed for the 1968 Borrego Mountain, California, earthquake were used after correcting for the distance and the radiation pattern. These records which were used as an empirical Green's function for the individual events were superposed, with some randomness, to produce ground motions resulting from a large earthquake. The models were constrained by gross seismological data at three periods. At 1 sec they are constrained by the observed upper bound of the local magnitude (ML = Formula), and, at about 10 sec, by the upper bound of the seismic moment of the individual event of multiple shocks (5 x 1026 dyne-cm). At very long periods, the models have the correct total seismic moment. The results obtained for a model of the 1857 earthquake indicate that: (1) the velocity response spectra of ground motions in the near-field are nearly flat at about 50 cm/sec over the period range from 1 to 10 sec under normal conditions; (2) under certain circumstances they can be as large as 150 cm/sec; (3) the maximum duration of the ground motion is 6 min. These results are considered reasonable because they satisfy all the seismological constraints currently available over a wide period range.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis, B. Zhang, G. Dong, A. S. Papageorgiou, U. Dutta, and N. N. Biswas
Estimation of Strong Ground Motion from the Great 1964 Mw 9.2 Prince William Sound, Alaska, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2303 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. Assatourians and G. M. Atkinson
Modeling Variable-Stress Distribution with the Stochastic Finite-Fault Technique
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1935 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Characterization for Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation: Kinematic Heterogeneous Source Model and Strong Motion Generation Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2531 - 2545.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Ground Motions at Memphis and St. Louis from M 7.5-8.0 Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1015 - 1024.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Parameters of Earthquakes in Eastern and Western North America Based on Finite-Fault Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 695 - 710.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. Dan and T. Sato
A semi-empirical method for simulating strong ground motions based on variable-slip rupture models for large earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1999; 89(1): 36 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. W. Graves
Three-dimensional finite-difference modeling of the San Andreas fault: Source parameterization and ground-motion levels
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1998; 88(4): 881 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and G. M. Atkinson
Modeling finite-fault radiation from the {omega}n spectrum
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 67 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. L. Teng and J. Qu
Long-period ground motions and dynamic strain field of Los Angeles basin during large earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1996; 86(5): 1417 - 1433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. A. W. Haddon
Use of empirical Green's functions, spectral ratios, and kinematic source models for simulating strong ground motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1996; 86(3): 597 - 615.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. B. Olsen, R. J. Archuleta, and J. R. Matarese
Three-Dimensional Simulation of a Magnitude 7.75 Earthquake on the San Andreas Fault
Science, December 8, 1995; 270(5242): 1628 - 1632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. DAN, T. ISHII, and M. EBIHARA
Estimation of strong ground motions in meizoseismal region of the 1976 Tangshan, China, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1756 - 1777.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. KANAMORI, P. C. JENNINGS, S. K. SINGH, and L. ASTIZ
Estimation of strong ground motions in Mexico City expected for large earthquakes in the Guerrero seismic gap
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1993; 83(3): 811 - 829.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. DAN, T. WATANABE, T. TANAKA, and R. SATO
Stability of earthquake ground motion synthesized by using different small-event records as empirical Green's functions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6A): 1433 - 1455.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. HOUSTON and H. KANAMORI
Source spectra of great earthquakes: Teleseismic constraints on rupture process and strong motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 19 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. G. WESNOUSKY, C. H. SCHOLZ, K. SHIMAZAKI, and T. MATSUDA
Integration of geological and seismological data for the analysis of seismic hazard: A case study of Japan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 687 - 708.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. S. PAPAGEORGIOU and K. AKI
A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1983; 73(3): 693 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. AKI
Strong motion prediction using mathematical modeling techniques
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S29 - S41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. HADLEY, D. V. HELMBERGER, and J. A. ORCUTT
Peak acceleration scaling studies
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1982; 72(3): 959 - 979.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. W. CAMPBELL
Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 2039 - 2070.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. BOUCHON and K. AKI
Simulation of long-period, near-field motion for the great California earthquake of 1857
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1980; 70(5): 1669 - 1682.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. HARTZELL
Faulting process of the May 17, 1976 Gazli, USSR earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1980; 70(5): 1715 - 1736.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. BUTLER and H. KANAMORI
Long-period ground motion from a great earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 943 - 961.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America