Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1980; v. 70; no. 3; p. 775-789
© 1980 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCMECHAN, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by OTTOLINI, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Direct observation of a p-{tau} curve in a slant stacked wave field

GEORGE A. MCMECHAN* and RICHARD OTTOLINI

STANFORD EXPLORATION PROJECT DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305

Abstract

The well known Wiechert-Herglotz technique for computing a velocity-depth profile from refraction seismograms uses data in the form of ray parameter as a function of intercept time (a p-{tau} curve). The technique of slant stacking used by reflection seismologists automatically produces a p-{tau} curve from a common shot profile, thereby bypassing arbitrary travel-time picking and several intermediate calculations of previous methods. Successful preliminary results are presented for both synthetic and real data. This method deteriorates for widely separated geophones and where a number of apparent sources with low inter-source coherency coexist in a single profile, but is capable of completely sorting out triplications in data with less extreme contrasts without human intervention.

Footnotes

* On leave from Pacific Geoscience Centre, Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy Mines & Resources, Box 6000, Sidney, B.C., V8L 4B2, Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. G. Hennet, R. B. Hawman, and R. A. Phinney
Slant stacks of refraction data from maine: Effects of lateral variations in velocity structure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1541 - 1559.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. Carbonell and S. B. Smithson
Inversion of reflected PP, SS, and converted PS/SP travel times for crustal structure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1889 - 1902.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. H. COLBURN and R. B. HAWMAN
Inversion of slant stacks of deep crustal refraction data from the Great Valley, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2224 - 2247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HAWMAN and R. A. PHINNEY
Analysis of sparse wide-angle reflection data in the {tau}(p) domain
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1991; 81(1): 202 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. C. WALCK and R. W. CLAYTON
Analysis of upper mantle structure using wave field continuation of P waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1984; 74(5): 1703 - 1719.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America