Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1980; v. 70; no. 4; p. 1103-1123
© 1980 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DRAKE, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by BOLT, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Love waves normally incident at a continental boundary

LAWRENCE A. DRAKE and BRUCE A. BOLT

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720

Abstract

The dispersion curve for fundamental-mode Love waves between periods of 60 and 4.375 sec has been obtained by the finite element method for a path normally incident at a continental margin (California) between a seismometer site on the ocean bottom 120 km from the continental shelf and a coastal seismographic station (Berkeley). Between periods of 60 and 17.5 sec, the computed phase velocity of fundamental-mode Love waves across the continental margin was very slightly greater (less than 1 per cent) than the mean of the phase velocities of fundamental-mode Love waves in the horizontally layered structures at the ends of the model representing the regions of the ocean bottom and continent. Between periods of 15 and 4.375 sec, the phase velocity of fundamental-mode Love waves across the finite element model was, in general, slightly less (about 2 per cent) than the mean of the phase velocities of fundamental-mode Love waves in the horizontally layered bounding structures. Two important new results concerning the propagation of the energy of fundamental-mode Love waves at a continental boundary were obtained. First, between periods of 20 and 11 sec, 90 per cent of the energy of fundamental-mode Love waves incident from the oceanic side is transmitted as the first higher mode. Second, between periods of 15 and 8 sec, only 2 per cent of the energy of fundamental-mode Love waves incident from either the oceanic or the continental side of the continental boundary is transmitted in waves of the fundamental Love mode. From the first of these results, it follows that, at periods of 20 sec or less, measurements on a continent of the phase velocity of fundamental-mode Love waves will be contaminated by the presence of the first higher mode. From the second, it follows that, between periods of 15 and 8 sec, the continental boundary is a barrier to the propagation of fundamental-mode Love waves in both directions, quite independently of damping. This strongly affects estimates of the attenuation of fundamental-mode Love waves. Fundamental-mode Love wave microseisms on the ocean floor from an oceanic source can be expected to be approximately four times as large as fundamental-mode Love wave microseisms from the same source at continental sites.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. W. SCHLUE and K. K. HOSTETTLER
Rayleigh-wave phase velocity and amplitude values in the presence of lateral heterogeneities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1987; 77(1): 244 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. T. BULLITT and M. N. TOKSOZ
Three-dimensional ultrasonic modeling of Rayleigh wave propagation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1087 - 1104.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America