Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1980; v. 70; no. 6; p. 2253-2260
© 1980 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAKJANIc, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the frequency distribution of earthquake magnitude and intensity

BERISLAV MAKJANIc

GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE FACULTY OF SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB, GRIC 3, 41001 ZAGREB, Yugoslavia

Abstract

Since the usual Gutenberg and Richter distribution of magnitudes does not give good fit to the observed data except in the middle of the range, it is proposed to find a new distribution of magnitudes starting from the two principles: (a) distribution of all magnitudes (initial distribution) has to be limited; and (b) distribution of the largest values (extremal distribution) has to be asymptotic extremal distribution for the given initial distribution. Since it is well established that the largest values of intensity and magnitude follow the so-called third asymptote, which is conveniently written in Jenkinson's form, the initial distribution which belongs to this extremal distribution is determined. A procedure for determining the parameters of the initial distribution is proposed. For the time being, better results are obtained from macroseismic intensities, since often the magnitudes are being determined from these intensities by means of the linear regression. As an example, the frequency distribution of the 100-yr series of intensity of Zagreb earthquakes is analyzed. It seems that this initial distribution, which turns out to be the generalized exponential distribution, gives good fit to the data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. KIJKO
Is it necessary to construct empirical distributions of maximum earthquake magnitudes?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1984; 74(1): 339 - 347.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. ANDERSON and J. E. LUCO
Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 471 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. W. BURTON, I. G. MAIN, and R. E. LONG
Perceptible earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States (Examined using Gumbel's third distribution of extreme values)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 497 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. MAKJANIc
On the generalized exponential distribution of earthquake intensity and magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1982; 72(3): 981 - 986.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. KIJKO and M. A. SELLEVOLL
Triple exponential distribution, a modified model for the occurrence of large earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 2097 - 2101.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. F. HOWELL Jr.
On the saturation of earthquake magnitudes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1981; 71(5): 1401 - 1422.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America