Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1981; v. 71; no. 1; p. 321-334
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCGUIRE, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by BARNHARD, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Effects of temporal variations in seismicity on seismic hazard

ROBIN K. MCGUIRE* and THEODORE P. BARNHARD

OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE STUDIES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, BOX 25046
DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

The accuracy of stationary mathematical models of seismicity for calculating probabilities of damaging shaking is examined using the history of earthquakes in China from 1350 A.D. to 1949 A.D. During this time, rates of seismic activity varied periodically by a factor of 10. Probabilities of damaging shaking are calculated in 62 cities in North China using 50 yr of earthquake data to estimate seismicity parameters; the probabilities are compared to statistics of damaging shaking in the same cities for 50 yr following the data window. These comparisons indicate that the seismic hazard analysis is accurate if: (1) the maximum possible earthquake size in each seismogenic zone is determined from the entire seismic history rather than from a short-time window; and (2) the future seismic activity can be estimated accurately. The first condition emphasizes the importance of realistically estimating the maximum possible size of earthquakes on faults. The second indicates the need to understand possible trends in seismic activity where these exist, or to develop an earthquake prediction capability with which to estimate future activity. Without the capability of estimating future seismicity, stationary models provide less accurate but generally conservative indications of seismic ground-shaking hazard.

In the United States, the available earthquake history is brief but gives no indication of changing rates of activity. The rate of seismic strain release in the Central and Eastern United States has been constant over the last 180 yr, and the geological record of earthquakes on the southern San Andreas Fault indicates no temporal trend for large shocks over the last 15 centuries. Both observations imply that seismic activity is either stationary or of such a long period that it may be treated as stationary for seismic hazard analyses in the United States.

Footnotes

* Present address: Dames and Moore, 1626 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Albarello and V. D'Amico
Validation of Intensity Attenuation Relationships
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 719 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Time-Independent and Time-Dependent Seismic Hazard in Greece Based on Seismogenic Sources
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 22 - 33.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. LAMARRE, B. TOWNSHEND, and H. C. SHAH
Application of the bootstrap method to quantify uncertainty in seismic hazard estimates
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1992; 82(1): 104 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. ALLIN CORNELL and S. R. WINTERSTEIN
Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1522 - 1537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. K. MCGUIRE and K. M. SHEDLOCK
Statistical uncertainties in seismic hazard evaluations in the United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1981; 71(4): 1287 - 1308.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America