Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1981; v. 71; no. 3; p. 787-801
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EBERHART-PHILLIPS, D.
Right arrow Articles by HERRMANN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Analysis of the 4 February 1976 Chino Valley, Arizona, earthquake

DONNA EBERHART-PHILLIPS, RANDALL M. RICHARDSON, MARC L. SBAR and ROBERT B. HERRMANN

DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON, ARIZONA 85721
DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCESSAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63101

Abstract

This mb = 4.9 earthquake was located about 20 km north of Prescott in the Transition Zone between the Basin and Range and Colorado Plateau provinces. Several lines of approach were used to determine the focal mechanism: P-wave first motions; surface wave amplitude and phase spectra; and synthetic seismograms. The preferred focal mechanism displays northwest trending nodal planes with predominantly normal movement. The inferred fault plane strikes 120°, dips 40°SW, with a slip of – 100° and a depth of 10 to 15 km. The seismic moment is 1.0 x 1023 dyne-cm. The azimuth of least-horizontal stress is inferred to be 37°. Lithostatic stress generated by variations in elevation and density between the crusts of the southern Basin and Range and Colorado Plateau may contribute to the inferred stress orientations. Uplift and resultant extension in this zone of thin lithosphere and relatively high heat flow may also be important. Microearthquake studies in the Chino Valley during the summers of 1978 and 1979 indicate a microseismicity rate of 0.3 events per day. This is an order of magnitude less than that observed in the Intermountain seismic belt.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. H. Bakun
MMI Attenuation and Historical Earthquakes in the Basin and Range Province of Western North America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2206 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Lay, J. Ritsema, C. J. Ammon, and T. Wallace
Rapid source-mechanism analysis of the April 29, 1993 cataract Creek (Mw = 5.3), northern Arizona earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. KRUGER-KNUEPFER, M. L. SBAR, and R. M. RICHARDSON
Microseismicity of the Kaibab Plateau, northern Arizona, and its tectonic implications
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1985; 75(2): 491 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America