Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1981; v. 71; no. 4; p. 1089-1103
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREENHALGH, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by MOONEY, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Magnitude calibration of the Central Minnesota Seismic Array

S. A. GREENHALGH, C. C. MOSHER and H. M. MOONEY

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES 2006 Australia
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55455
ARCO OIL AND GAS COMPANY, EPRC, P.O. BOX 2819, DALLAS, TEXAS 75221

Abstract

Magnitude calibration for the Central Minnesota Seismic Array presents special problems because the infrequuent local and near-regional earthquake are usually too small to be recorded at teleseismic distances. Two procedures have been applied. The first uses teleseisms recorded by the array for which independent magnitudes are available. The second uses large near-regional mine blasts to determine the attenuation rate for short-period P waves in the upper crust, together with Evernden's (1970) magnitude-charge size relationship.

The teleseismic correlations establish that the individual stations of the array yield consistent magnitudes, that the P wave amplitudes behave predictably with respect to epicentral distance and azimuth, but that a magnitude-dependent bias must be removed.

Measured ground amplitudes for mine blasts are found to be proportional to total charge size to the power 1.0. Using this value, we find amplitude attenuation proportional to D–B for distance D in kilometers, with best fit given by B = 2.57 for P waves. The final local magnitude scale for D up to 250 km takes the form


Formula







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America