Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by JOYNER, W. B. Articles by FUMAL, T. E. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The effect of quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

The effect of alluvium on strong ground motion can be seen by comparing two strong-motion records of the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 6 August 1979 (M_L = 5.9). One record at a site on Franciscan bedrock had a peak horizontal acceleration of 0.13 g and a peak horizontal velocity of 10 cm/sec. The other, at a site 2 km distant on 180 meters of Quaternary alluvium overlying Franciscan, had values of 0.26 g and 32 cm/sec, amplifications by factors of 2 and 3. Horizontal motions computed at the alluvial site for a linear plane-layered model based on measured P and S velocities show reasonably good agreement in shape with the observed motions, but the observed peak amplitudes are greater by a factor of about 1.25 in acceleration and 1.8 in velocity. About 15 per cent of the discrepancy in acceleration and 20 per cent in velocity can be attributed to the difference in source distance; the remainder may represent focusing by refraction at a bedrock surface concave upward. There is no clear evidence of nonlinear soil response. Fourier spectral ratios between motions observed on bedrock and alluvium show good agreement with ratios predicted from the linear model. In particular, the observed frequency of the fundamental peak in the amplification spectrum agrees with the computed value, indicating that no significant nonlinearity occurs in the secant shear modulus. Computations show that nonlinear models are compatible with the data if values of the coefficient of dynamic shear strength in terms of vertical effective stress are in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 or greater. The data illustrate that site amplification may be less a matter of resonance involving reinforcing multiple reflections, and more the simple effect of the low near-surface velocity. Application of traditional seismological theory leads to the conclusion that the site amplification for peak horizontal velocity is approximately proportional to the reciprocal of the square root of the product of density and shear-wave velocity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Douglas, P. Gehl, L. F. Bonilla, O. Scotti, J. Regnier, A.-M. Duval, and E. Bertrand Making the Most of Available Site Information for Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1502 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Atkinson and M. Macias Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1552 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-W. Huang, J.-H. Wang, K.-F. Ma, C.-Y. Wang, J.-H. Hung, and K.-L. Wen Frequency-Dependent Site Amplifications with f >= 0.01 Hz Evaluated from Velocity and Density Models in Central Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 624 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tavakoli and S. Pezeshk Empirical-Stochastic Ground-Motion Prediction for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2283 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Stephenson, J. N. Louie, S. Pullammanappallil, R. A. Williams, and J. K. Odum Blind Shear-Wave Velocity Comparison of ReMi and MASW Results with Boreholes to 200 m in Santa Clara Valley: Implications for Earthquake Ground-Motion Assessment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2506 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Sokolov, K.-P. Bonjer, M. Oncescu, and M. Rizescu Hard Rock Spectral Models for Intermediate-Depth Vrancea, Romania, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1749 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. W. Campbell Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and Its Use in the Development of Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations in Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1012 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Site Response, Shallow Shear-Wave Velocity, and Wave Propagation at the San Jose, California, Dense Seismic Array Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 443 - 464.

				Wave Propagation and Site Response in the Santa Clara Valley Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 480 - 500.

				E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Wald and J. Mori Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Linear Site-Response Amplifications in the Los Angeles Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S32 - S42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Wills, M. Petersen, W. A. Bryant, M. Reichle, G. J. Saucedo, S. Tan, G. Taylor, and J. Treiman A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S187 - S208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Correlation of 1- to 10-Hz Earthquake Resonances with Surface Measurements of S-wave Reflections and Refractions in the Upper 50 m Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1323 - 1331.

				Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Considering Nonlinear Site Effect Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 66 - 72.

				J. G. Anderson and J. N. Brune Methodology for using precarious rocks in Nevada to test seismic hazard models Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1999; 89(2): 456 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. P. Dimitriu, Ch. A. Papaioannou, and N. P. Theodulidis EURO-SEISTEST strong-motion array near Thessaloniki, Northern Greece: A study of site effects Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 862 - 873. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hartzell, E. Cranswick, A. Frankel, D. Carver, and M. Meremonte Variability of site response in the Los Angeles urban area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1377 - 1400. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Abercrombie Near-surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 731 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Boore and W. B. Joyner Site amplifications for generic rock sites Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 327 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-K. Chung and Y. T. Yeh Shallow crustal structure from short-period Rayleigh-wave dispersion data in southwestern Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 370 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Anderson, Y. Lee, Y. Zeng, and S. Day Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1749 - 1759. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen Nonlinear soil response--A reality? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K.-H. Yoon and G. A. McMechan 3D eight-order elastic finite-difference modeling of refraction and strong-motion data from the Coyote Lake region, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1996; 86(3): 616 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B.-H. Chin and K. Aki Reply to Leif Wennerberg's comment on "Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 268 - 273. [PDF]

				I. A. Beresnev, K.-L. Wen, and Y. Tein Yeh Nonlinear soil amplification: Its corroboration in Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 496 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Gibbs, D. M. Boore, W. B. Joyner, and T. E. Fumal The attenuation of seismic shear waves in quaternary alluvium in Santa Clara Valley, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1994; 84(1): 76 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FRANKEL Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the San Bernardino Valley, California, for hypothetical earthquakes on the San Andreas fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1020 - 1041. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. HARLOW, R. A. WHITE, M. J. RYMER, and S. ALVAREZ G. The San Salvador earthquake of 10 October 1986 and its historical context Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1143 - 1154. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. WILLIAMS, K. W. KING, and J. C. TINSLEY Site response estimates in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, from borehole seismic velocities Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1993; 83(3): 862 - 889. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. YU, J. G. ANDERSON, and R. SIDDHARTHAN On the characteristics of nonlinear soil response Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1993; 83(1): 218 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FRANKEL and J. VIDALE A three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from a Loma Prieta aftershock Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2045 - 2074. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER Estimation of ground motion at deep-soil sites in eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2167 - 2185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. CASTRO, J. G. ANDERSON, and J. N. BRUNE Origin of high P/S spectral ratios from the Guerrero accelerograph array Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1991; 81(6): 2268 - 2288. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. FLETCHER and J. BOATWRIGHT Source parameters of Loma Prieta aftershocks and wave propagation characteristics along the San Francisco Peninsula from a joint inversion of digital seismograms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1991; 81(5): 1783 - 1812. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. B. DARRAGH and A. F. SHAKAL The site response of two rock and soil station pairs to strong and weak ground motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1991; 81(5): 1885 - 1899. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FRANKEL, S. HOUGH, P. FRIBERG, and R. BUSBY Observations of Loma Prieta aftershocks from a dense array in Sunnyvale, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1991; 81(5): 1900 - 1922. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. W. KING, A. C. TARR, D. L. CARVER, R. A. WILLIAMS, and D. M. WORLEY Seismic ground-response studies in Olympia, Washington, and vicinity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1990; 80(5): 1057 - 1078. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. SEALE and R. J. ARCHULETA Site amplification and attenuation of strong ground motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1989; 79(6): 1673 - 1696. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. JARPE, C. H. CRAMER, B. E. TUCKER, and A. F. SHAKAL A comparison of observations of ground response to weak and strong ground motion at Coalinga, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 421 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. M. SHEARER and J. A. ORCUTT Surface and near-surface effects on seismic waves--theory and borehole seismometer results Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1168 - 1196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. S. PHILLIPS and K. AKI Site amplification of coda waves from local earthquakes in central California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1986; 76(3): 627 - 648. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. WILSON and P. C. JENNINGS Spatial variation of ground motion determined from accelerograms recorded on a highway bridge Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1515 - 1533. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. MUELLER and E. CRANSWICK Source parameters from locally recorded aftershocks of the 9 January 1982 Miramichi, New Brunswick, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1985; 75(2): 337 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-L. LIU and D. V. HELMBERGER The near-source ground motion of the 6 August 1979 Coyote Lake, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1983; 73(1): 201 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER The empirical prediction of ground motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S43 - S60. [Abstract] [PDF]