Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by HOWELL, B. F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On the saturation of earthquake magnitudes

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 439 DEIKE BUILDING
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA 16802

Abstract

As M_S, m_b, or unified magnitude approaches 8, there is an abrupt change in the rate at which frequency of occurrence decreases with magnitude. This change is not observed for moment-magnitude, M_W. Data on past earthquakes are insufficient to prove whether there is a finite upper limit on M_S, m_b, or unified magnitude or whether earthquake probability is better described by an unlimited logarithmic relation of the form

This empirical equation, however, fits the world data best.

If there is an upper limit on size, it is approximately 8.1 for m_b, 8.7 for M_S, and 8.9 for unified magnitude.

For regions such as the contiguous United States and Alaska, there are too few large earthquakes for saturation to be clearly observed, but the data at large magnitudes fit an empirical equation of shape

better than either the Gumbel I or III theory. This equation provides for a more sudden saturation than Gumbel's theory allows.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. F. Howell Jr. Patterns of seismic activity after three great earthquakes in the light of Reid's elastic rebound theory Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 50 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. F. HOWELL JR< On the effect of too small a data base on earthquake frequency diagrams Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1205 - 1207. [PDF]

				M. G. BONILLA, R. K. MARK, and J. J. LIENKAEMPER Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length, and surface fault displacement Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1984; 74(6): 2379 - 2411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. G. MAIN and P. W. BURTON Information theory and the earthquake frequency-magnitude distribution Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1409 - 1426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. F. Howell Jr. On the variation of seismic hazard along the San Andreas fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 709 - 723. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. KIJKO Is it necessary to construct empirical distributions of maximum earthquake magnitudes? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1984; 74(1): 339 - 347. [PDF]

				P. W. BURTON, I. G. MAIN, and R. E. LONG Perceptible earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States (Examined using Gumbel's third distribution of extreme values) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 497 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. C. LILWALL and P. G. CHALLENOR Comments on "On the saturation of earthquake magnitude," by B. F. Howell, Jr. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1983; 73(1): 327 - 331. [PDF]

				B. F. HOWELL JR< Reply to R. C. Lilwall and P. G. Challenor's "Comments on 'On the saturation of earthquake magnitude'" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1983; 73(1): 333 - 333. [PDF]