Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1981; v. 71; no. 5; p. 1637-1648
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Consequence of an earthquake prediction on statistical estimates of seismic risk

JOHN G. ANDERSON

DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, MAIL CODE B-010
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093
INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093

Abstract

This paper formulates a procedure for estimating the consequence of an earthquake prediction on statistical estimates of seismic risk. Several examples, using this procedure, indicate the following general conclusions: if a prediction with a confidence level of 1.0 significantly affects the risk at a site, then the same prediction at smaller confidence levels will also affect the risk. If an earthquake is predicted in a high risk zone, it can be important for an entire adjacent low risk zone; a prediction for the adjacent low risk zone may not affect the high risk zone at all. Finally, a prediction for a region which may significantly affect the amplitudes of shaking that can be expected in the next year may have no importance for structures which are designed (or planned) with a 50 or more year lifetime, depending on the size of the predicted earthquakes.

These conclusions are drawn from a hypothetical, yet plausible, case study in the Los Angeles, California, region, where hypothetical predictions are considered for events on the San Andreas fault, the Sierra Madre fault, and a region of about 4300 km2 covering the most populated region of the Los Angeles basin. For the background seismicity model used in this study, the threshold of a significant (to the seismic risk) prediction for 1-yr risk is M = 5 on the San Andreas fault, M = Formula on the Sierra Madre fault, and M = 4 in the Los Angeles zone. For the 50-yr risk, the thresholds of significance are M = 7, M = Formula, and M = 6, respectively, for the same three zones.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America