Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1983; v. 73; no. 2; p. 419-434
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARKER, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by LANGSTON, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A teleseismic body-wave analysis of the May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquakes

JEFFERY S. BARKER and CHARLES A. LANGSTON

DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 403 DEIKE BUILDING, UNIVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA 16802

Abstract

Teleseismic P-wave first motions for the M greater double equals 6 earthquakes near Mammoth Lakes, California, are inconsistent with the vertical strike-slip mechanisms determined from local and regional P-wave first motions. Combining these data sets allows three possible mechanisms: a north-striking, east-dipping strike-slip fault; a NE-striking oblique fault; and a NNW-striking normal fault. Inversion of long-period teleseismic P and SH waves for the events of 25 May 1980 (1633 UTC) and 27 May 1980 (1450 UTC) yields moment tensors with large non-double-couple components. The moment tensor for the first event may be decomposed into a major double couple with strike = 18°, dip = 61°, and rake = –15°, and a minor double couple with strike = 303°, dip = 43°, and rake = 224°. A similar decomposition for the last event yields strike = 25°, dip = 65°, rake = –6°, and strike = 312°, dip = 37°, and rake = 232°. Although the inversions were performed on only a few teleseismic body waves, the radiation patterns of the moment tensors are consistent with most of the P-wave first motion polarities at local, regional, and teleseismic distances. The stress axes inferred from the moment tensors are consistent with N65°E extension determined by geodetic measurements by Savage et al. (1981). Seismic moments computed from the moment tensors are 1.87 x 1025 dyne-cm for the 25 May 1980 (1633 UTC) event and 1.03 x 1025 dyne-cm for the 27 May 1980 (1450 UTC) event. The non-double-couple aspect of the moment tensors and the inability to obtain a convergent solution for the 25 May 1980 (1944 UTC) event may indicate that the assumptions of a point source and plane-layered structure implicit in the moment tensor inversion are not entirely valid for the Mammoth Lakes earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Complex Source Process of the 17 August 1999 Izmit, Turkey, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 267 - 277.



Home page
ScienceHome page
D. S. Dreger, H. Tkal, and M. Johnston
Dilational Processes Accompanying Earthquakes in the Long Valley Caldera
Science, April 7, 2000; 288(5463): 122 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Frohlich and C. Frohlich
Earthquakes with Non--Double-Couple Mechanisms
Science, May 6, 1994; 264(5160): 804 - 809.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. I. DOSER
Foreshocks and aftershocks of large (M greater double equals 5.5) earthquakes within the western Cordillera of the United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 110 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. I. DOSER and R. B. SMITH
An assessment of source parameters of earthquakes in the cordillera of the western United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1989; 79(5): 1383 - 1409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. G. SOMERVILLE, J. P. MCLAREN, L. V. LEFEVRE, R. W. BURGER, and D. V. HELMBERGER
Comparison of source scaling relations of eastern and western North American earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1987; 77(2): 322 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. S. BARKER and T. C. WALLACE
A note on the teleseismic body waves from the 23 November 1984 round valley, California, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1986; 76(3): 883 - 888.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. E. CHAVEZ and K. F. PRIESTLEY
ML observations in the Great Basin and M0 versus ML relationships for the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1583 - 1598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. A. MCMECHAN, J. H. LUETGERT, and W. D. MOONEY
Imaging of earthquake sources in Long Valley Caldera, California, 1983
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1005 - 1020.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. EKSTROM and A. M. DZIEWONSKI
Centroid-moment tensor solutions for 35 earthquakes in Western North America (1977-1983)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1985; 75(1): 23 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America