Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1983; v. 73; no. 2; p. 497-518
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURTON, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by LONG, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Perceptible earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States (Examined using Gumbel's third distribution of extreme values)

PAUL W. BURTON, IAN G. MAIN and ROGER E. LONG

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES MURCHISON HOUSE, WEST MAINS ROAD, EDINBURGH EH9 3LA, Scotland
UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES SCIENCE LABORATORIES, SOUTH ROAD, DURHAM, England

Abstract

Earthquake perceptibility P(l/m) in the Central and Eastern United States is defined as the joint probability that a point site perceives ground motion at least at intensity I in conjunction with an earthquake occurrence specifically of magnitude m.

Regional seismicity expressed in the catalogs of Meyers and von Hake (1976) and Nuttli (1979) is examined in terms of magnitude frequency using Gumbel's asymptotic extreme value distribution with an upper bound to magnitude (Gumbel III). The large "rogue" earthquakes associated particularly with the New Madrid seismic zone lead to upper bounded macroseismic body-wave magnitudes with large uncertainties around mb Formula; but this approximate value is not contradicted by deterministic arguments.

Examination of the regional earthquake perceptibility curves then shows a maximum perceptibility at several intensity levels for earthquakes in a relatively narrow band of magnitudes around mb Formula. For the Central and Eastern United States, this most perceptible magnitude is the earthquake which is most likely to be felt at any site, and this might be used in aseismic engineering design of noncritical structures. Extension of the analysis to integrated perceptibility then facilitates calculation of intensity expectation at any site.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. ANDERSON
Seismic strain rates in the Central and Eastern United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 273 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. G. MAIN and P. W. BURTON
Information theory and the earthquake frequency-magnitude distribution
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1409 - 1426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. F. Howell Jr.
On the variation of seismic hazard along the San Andreas fault
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 709 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America