Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1983; v. 73; no. 4; p. 1077-1097
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORI, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Dynamic stress drops of moderate earthquakes of the Eastern Aleutians and their relation to a great earthquake

JIM MORI

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964

Abstract

Short-period WWSSN records are used to calculate dynamic stress drops of moderate earthquakes (mb = 5.5 to 6.1) in the Eastern Aleutians, Alaska. For short-period pulses where scattering effects often distort the pulse shape, estimates of dynamic stress drop using the formula of Boatwright (1980) have fewer sources of uncertainty than does the formula for static stress drop given by Brune (1970, 1971). Earthquakes of several tectonic settings within the subduction zone were studied: shallow (5 to 8 km) normal faulting events near the trench; earthquakes in the main thrust zone (30- to 50-km depth), and intermediate-depth (100 to 200 km) earthquakes in the Benioff zone. Dynamic stress drops of the intermediate-depth earthquakes ranged from 20 to 70 bars while the stress drop of earthquakes in the main thrust zone varied over a considerably larger range, 10 to 300 bars. The two normal events had stress drops around 100 bars. Evidence from the great 1964 Alaska earthquake and its aftershocks also suggests an inhomogeneous stress field in the main thrust zone which may produce large amounts of high-frequency radiation when ruptured by a large earthquake.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Empirical Peak Ground-Motion Predictive Relations for Shallow Earthquakes in Greece
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2591 - 2603.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. A. Abers, J. Beavan, S. Horton, S. Jaume, and E. Triep
Large accelerations and tectonic setting of the May 1993 Shumagin Islands earthquake sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1730 - 1738.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. M. BOYD and K. JACOB
Seismicity of the Unalaska region, Alaska
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1986; 76(2): 463 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. MORI
Short- and long-period subevents of the 4 February 1965 Rat Islands earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1331 - 1347.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America