Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1983; v. 73; no. 4; p. 1187-1196
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROUSE, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by MATUSCHKA, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Digitization noise and accelerograph pen offset associated with Japanese accelerograms

C. B. CROUSE and TREVOR MATUSCHKA

ERTEC, INC., 3777 LONG BEACH BLVD., LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90807

Abstract

Ground-motion accelerograms recorded in Japan between 1956 and 1978 were recently processed. Preprocessing studies of the accelerograms were required that consisted of: (1) evaluation of the long-period digitization noise in the accelerograms, and (2) correction for initial offset of the recording pen in the SMAC accelerograph. Long-period digitization noise present in each accelerogram was identified from the Fourier Amplitude Spectrum of the uncorrected accelerogram. Similar investigations with United States accelerograms recorded on 70-mm film revealed that the noise in both sets of data had similar characteristics. In nearly all cases, the noise spectrum was proportional to the period, which suggested that fatigue and carelessness of the operator during digitization may have been responsible for the observed period dependence. Correction for initial pen offset was necessary for some Japanese accelerograms because the pen arm was not parallel to the direction of movement of the recording paper. To account for pen offset, values of the initial pen rotation were assumed, and the accelerograms were corrected using a simple algorithm. Our best estimate of the true offset was based not only on the offset which best removed the slanted appearance, but also the offset inferred from the original accelerogram.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America