Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1983; v. 73; no. 4; p. 1225-1241
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ATKINSON, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHARLWOOD, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment as a function of probability level: A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia

GAIL M. ATKINSON and ROBIN G. CHARLWOOD

KLOHN LEONOFF, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, 10180 SHELLBRIDGE WAY, RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, Canada , V6X 2W7

Abstract

The stability of probabilistic methods of evaluating expected strong ground motion levels is examined as a function of probability level. A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia, is used to show that when input parameters are screened on the basis of compatibility with low probability calculations, robust (±25 per cent) results are obtained for probabilities in the range of 10–2 to 10–4 per annum. There is no inherent loss of stability with decreasing probability.

Probabilistic approaches are not in conflict with deterministic approaches, since deterministic data can be incorporated into the analysis. The usefulness of the probabilistic approach lies in providing a framework for evaluating uncertainties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. O. Strasser and J. J. Bommer
Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2613 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ and D. M. STEINBERG
Seismic hazard sensitivity analysis: A multi-parameter approach
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 796 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America