|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
KLOHN LEONOFF, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, 10180 SHELLBRIDGE WAY, RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, Canada , V6X 2W7
Abstract
The stability of probabilistic methods of evaluating expected strong ground motion levels is examined as a function of probability level. A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia, is used to show that when input parameters are screened on the basis of compatibility with low probability calculations, robust (±25 per cent) results are obtained for probabilities in the range of 102 to 104 per annum. There is no inherent loss of stability with decreasing probability.
Probabilistic approaches are not in conflict with deterministic approaches, since deterministic data can be incorporated into the analysis. The usefulness of the probabilistic approach lies in providing a framework for evaluating uncertainties.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. O. Strasser and J. J. Bommer Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2613 - 2637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. RABINOWITZ and D. M. STEINBERG Seismic hazard sensitivity analysis: A multi-parameter approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 796 - 817. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |