Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1984; v. 74; no. 2; p. 655-667
© 1984 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CACCAMO, D.
Right arrow Articles by NERI, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A new analytic procedure to determine hypocentral parameters of local seismic events

D. CACCAMO and G. NERI

ISTITUTO INTERNAZIONALE DI VULCANOLOGIA DEL C.N.R., VIALE REGINA MARGHERITA, 6, 95123 CATANIA, Italy
ISTITUTO GEOFISICO E GEODETICO DELL'UNIVERSITÀ DI MESSINA, MESSINA, Italy

Abstract

A new procedure for locating local earthquakes is proposed.

Essentially, this procedure consists in solving—by means of least-squares technique—a system of equations which is formally analogous to that of Geiger (Ax = b) but different from his in the values of the matrix A and vector b elements. This difference makes our procedure more reliable than Geiger's because it significantly reduces the cases of both iterative process divergence and low precision. Among the factors contributing to this progress the lesser possibility that the matrix A contains columns proportional (or nearly proportional) one to another is considered of particular influence.

More than 20,000 hypocentral calculations have been performed on simulated shocks: significant differences in the number of good locations were revealed between our procedure and the classical method of Geiger (1910). Ours is more precise, particularly when few stations were used or networks with an unsatisfactory geometry. The earth model also influences the observed differences as it contributes to generating those analytical conditions which make the calculation convergence more problematic when applying Geiger's method.

Further applications are currently carried out in order to verify the procedure features for velocity laws and station configuration different from those used in this study.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America