Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1984; v. 74; no. 2; p. 709-723
© 1984 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the variation of seismic hazard along the San Andreas fault

B. F. Howell, Jr.

DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA 16802

Abstract

Recurrence probabilities of earthquakes were evaluated at 33 locations along the San Andreas fault using Gumbel's method. Two minima in the mode of the largest annual earthquakes occur, one north of San Francisco centered around 38.75°N latitude and the other centered in the Carizzo Plain area at 35.25°N latitude. The latter is offset by an unusually large ratio of large to small earthquakes, so that only one minimum (around 38.75°N) is observed in the expected 100-yr earthquake size. This broad minimum closely coincides with where the San Andreas fault broke in 1906, and may be only temporary.

There appears to be a slight, systematic tendency for the observed largest 50-year earthquake to become larger than the expected 50-yr earthquake as the size of the area being studied is reduced. The preferred explanation for this is that the pattern of size as a function of frequency becomes nonlinear when the size of the area studied is less than the focal area of the largest earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. F. HOWELL JR<
On the effect of too small a data base on earthquake frequency diagrams
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1205 - 1207.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America