Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1984; v. 74; no. 4; p. 1361-1380
© 1984 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JONES, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Foreshocks (1966-1980) in the San Andreas system, California

LUCILE M. JONES*

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964

Abstract

The spatial and temporal distributions of seismicity preceding moderate (ML greater double equals 5.0) main shocks in the San Andreas fault system in California have been analyzed to recognize and characterize the patterns of foreshock occurrence. Of 20 main shocks in the San Andreas system, 7, or 35 per cent, have been preceded by immediate foreshock sequences that included events within 1 day and 5 km of the main shocks. A possible correlation of the rate of foreshock occurrence with type of faulting was found such that none of the four main shocks with reverse faulting had foreshocks while 44 per cent of the strike-slip earthquakes had foreshocks. Some enhanced seismic activity was also observed at relatively large distances from the main shock (13 to 30 km) 1 to 5 days before 40 per cent of the main shocks but this activity cannot be clearly distinguished from the background seismicity. Of the seven immediate foreshock sequences, only two had the swarm-like appearance of the class II foreshocks defined by Mogi. The other foreshock sequences appear to be single events (sometimes with their own aftershocks) preceding the respective main shocks. Four of these sequences are spatially correlated with distinct physical discontinuities in their faults between the hypocenters of the foreshock and main shock, and similar discontinuities may also be associated with the other sequences. The durations of the foreshock sequences were found to decrease as the depths of the main shocks increase from 3 to 11 km, which has been interpreted as a dependence on stress. To account for this stress dependence of the duration and the presence of discontinuities, a model for foreshocks occurrence is presented. This model proposes that foreshocks may represent a process of delayed multiple rupture and that the delay between occurrence of foreshock and main shock might represent the time needed for static fatigue to break the stronger rock at the discontinuity in the fault.

Footnotes

* Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Emerson Lake Body: A Link between the Landers and Hector Mine Earthquakes, Southern California, as Inferred from Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1606 - 1620.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
The Athens, Greece, Earthquake (Ms 5.9) of 7 September 1999: An Event Triggered by the Izmit, Turkey, 17 August 1999 Earthquake?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 312 - 321.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. J. Michael and L. M. Jones
Seismicity alert probabilities at Parkfield, California, revisited
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 117 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Wyss;, R. L. Aceves, S. K. Park;, R. J. Geller, D. D. Jackson, Y. Y. Kagan, and F. Mulargia;
Cannot Earthquakes Be Predicted?
Science, October 17, 1997; 278(5337): 487 - 490.
[Full Text]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. K. SAVAGE and D. M. DEPOLO
Foreshock probabilities in the western Great-Basin eastern Sierra Nevada
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1993; 83(6): 1910 - 1938.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. CONSOLE, M. MURRU, and B. ALESSANDRINI
Foreshock statistics and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction in the Italian region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1248 - 1263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. HAUKSSON and S. GROSS
Source parameters of the 1933 Long Beach earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1991; 81(1): 81 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. I. DOSER
A re-examination of the 1947 Manix, California, earthquake sequence and comparison to other sequences within the Mojave block
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1990; 80(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. I. DOSER
Foreshocks and aftershocks of large (M greater double equals 5.5) earthquakes within the western Cordillera of the United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 110 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. M. JONES
Foreshocks and time-dependent earthquake hazard assessment in southern California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1669 - 1679.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America