Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BENDER, B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A two-state Poisson model for seismic hazard estimation

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, BOX 25046, MAIL STOP 966, DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

Most seismic hazard analyses assume that earthquakes have a Poisson distribution and that data from recorded earthquakes can be used to predict future seismic activity in a region. Historic catalogs, however, may show different earthquake occurrence rates for regions that are geologically similar, suggesting, on a local scale at least, temporal variations in seismicity. The simple two-state model presented here allows a region to have both seismically "active" and "inactive" states; in this model, earthquakes have a Poisson distribution during both states, but occur at a higher rate when the region is "active." The probability of changing from one state to the other at any time is constant. The two-state model reduces to the usual Poisson model if the region is always "active" or if the rate is the same for both states.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. S. Schweig, E. S. Schweig, and M. A. Ellis Reconciling Short Recurrence Intervals with Minor Deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Science, May 27, 1994; 264(5163): 1308 - 1311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. ALLIN CORNELL and S. R. WINTERSTEIN Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1522 - 1537. [Abstract] [PDF]