Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1984; v. 74; no. 5; p. 1703-1719
© 1984 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALCK, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by CLAYTON, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Analysis of upper mantle structure using wave field continuation of P waves

MARIANNE C. WALCK and ROBERT W. CLAYTON

SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125

Abstract

Wave field continuation transforms seismic record section data directly into velocity-depth space, simultaneously providing an estimate of model nonuniqueness. This inversion, previously used for reflection and refraction data, converts readily to spherical earth problems through simple adjustments in each of the two linear transformations: the slant stack and downward continuation. Because the time resolution inherent in the data transforms to depth resolution in the model space, this method is extremely useful for analysis of data compatibility with preexisting models and direct comparison between data sets, as well as the complete inversion of raw data for structure. Wave field inversion demands densely sampled, digital data, and assumes source coherency and lateral homogeneity along the profile.

We test this technique for upper mantle analysis using a previously studied, large, array-recorded data set representative of structure beneath the Gulf of California. We compare slant stacks and downward continuations of both synthetic and data record sections to illustrate the method's resolution capability. Wave field continuation proves particularly useful in comparing entire data sets to various models; even subtle structural differences are resolvable given good data quality.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America