Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1984; v. 74; no. 5; p. 1757-1765
© 1984 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OGATA, Y.
Right arrow Articles by SHIMAZAKI, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Transition from aftershock to normal activity: The 1965 Rat Islands earthquake aftershock sequence

YOSHIKO OGATA and KUNIHIKO SHIMAZAKI

THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO, TOKYO 106, Japan
EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO, TOKYO 113, Japan

Abstract

A transition from aftershock to normal activity is identified 2200 days after the occurrence of the 1965 Rat Islands earthquake of Mw = 8.7. After this time, we observe a significant departure of the seismicity in the focal region from the extrapolated trend of the aftershock activity predicted by the modified Omori formula proposed by Utsu in 1961. The maximum likelihood estimate of the parameters for the formula and the selection of a statistical model based on the Akaike Information Criterion show that the whole aftershock sequence is best modeled by the combination of an ordinary aftershock sequence and secondary aftershock activity associated with the largest aftershock. Fitting of the activity after the transition period to the modified Omori formula results in an unusually low value of the decay constant. We interpret that this activity represents normal or background seismicity and not another secondary aftershock sequence. Defining background activity in a focal region of a large earthquake is essential for detection of seismic quiescence prior to the next major event.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. Stein and A. Newman
Characteristic and Uncharacteristic Earthquakes as Possible Artifacts: Applications to the New Madrid and Wabash Seismic Zones
Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2004; 75(2): 173 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Failure-Time Remapping in Compound Aftershock Sequences
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1449 - 1457.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. A. PAGE
Comments on "Earthquake frequency and prediction" by Liu Z.-R.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1986; 76(5): 1491 - 1496.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. M. BOYD and K. JACOB
Seismicity of the Unalaska region, Alaska
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1986; 76(2): 463 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America