Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1985; v. 75; no. 2; p. 391-396
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KREBES, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by HEARN, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the geometrical spreading of viscoelastic waves

E. S. KREBES and D. J. HEARN

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, CALGARY, ALBERTA, Canada , T2N 1N4

Abstract

Krebes and Hron (1980) derived a formula for the geometrical spreading factor L for a seismic wave propagating through a layered viscoelastic medium. They assumed the angle {gamma}0 between the propagation and attenuation vectors of the initial ray segment was constant. In this paper, the general formula for L is derived, in which {gamma}0 is a function of the take-off angle {theta}0 (the functional form depends on source conditions). For the special case {gamma}0 = {theta}0, which corresponds, for example, to an air-shot source just above the surface, the formula for L simplifies considerably. A few numerical evaluations of L for certain cases are also presented to illustrate the differences between elastic and viscoelastic geometrical spreading. The differences are small or negligible at small enough source-receiver offsets but can be large at greater offsets in cases where viscoelastic critical angles are different enough from elastic ones or do not exist. These cases, however, may not be very representative of true anelastic effects in the earth.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. E. Quiroga-Goode, E. S. Krebes, and L. H. T. Le
Modeling viscoelastic waves: a comparison of ray theory and the finite-difference method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1882 - 1888.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. S. KREBES and M. A. SLAWINSKI
On raytracing in an elastic-anelastic medium
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1991; 81(2): 667 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. WENNERBERG and G. GLASSMOYER
Absorption effects on plane waves in layered media
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1986; 76(5): 1407 - 1432.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America