Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KENNETT, B. L. N. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On regional S

RESEARCH SCHOOL OF EARTH SCIENCES THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, G.P.O. BOX 4, CANBERRA 2601, Australia

Abstract

The character of regional S wave trains is quite complex and consists of two major elements: Sn waves which principally travel in the upper mantle and Lg waves guided in the Earth's crust. The effect of lateral heterogeneity is to modify the signals for these phases compared with the predictions for horizontally stratified models. However, complete synthetic seismogram calculations for simple, stratified crustal models for a suite of distances out to 950 km, including both Sn and Lg, provide a range of insights into the nature of the S wave train. In particular, late picks of Sn arrivals are likely to arise because the actual S onset has been missed in the P coda, and a higher amplitude surface multiple phase with an extra crustal delay has been picked instead. Such a effect was first recognized by Lapwood (1955) in a study of the ISS readings for a sequence of Japanese events recorded at regional distances, but has usually not been taken into consideration in studies using regional networks.

Lateral heterogeneity along the propagation path has the effect of inducing interconversion between Sn and Lg energy and thus alters the character of the S wave train. The lower attenuation for S in the uppermost mantle, compared with the crust, frequently leaves Sn as the most prominent phase at ranges greater than 1000 km. Long range propagation of high-frequency Lg requires a relatively undisturbed crust.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Cruz-Jimenez, F. J. Chavez-Garcia, and T. Furumura Differences in Attenuation of Ground Motion Perpendicular to the Mexican Subduction Zone between Colima and Guerrero: An Explanation Based on Numerical Modeling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 400 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mitra, K. Priestley, V. K. Gaur, and S. S. Rai Frequency-Dependent Lg Attenuation in the Indian Platform Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2449 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. G. Krishna Propagation of Regional Seismic Phases in the Indian Shield: Constraints on Crustal and Upper Mantle Velocity Models Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 29 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Rapine, J. F. Ni, and T. M. Hearn Regional wave propagation in China and its surrounding regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1622 - 1636. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X.-B. Xie and T. Lay The log (rms Lg)-mb scaling law slope Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 834 - 844. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Zhang and T. Lay Analysis of short-period regional phase path effects associated with topography in Eurasia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1994; 84(1): 119 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. BOORE and G. M. ATKINSON Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1987; 77(2): 440 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. L. N. KENNETT Lg waves and structural boundaries Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1986; 76(4): 1133 - 1141. [Abstract] [PDF]