Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1985; v. 75; no. 4; p. 1179-1193
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SOURIAU, A.
Right arrow Articles by WOODHOUSE, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A strategy for deploying a seismological network for global studies of Earth structure

ANNIE SOURIAU* and J. H. WOODHOUSE

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES HOFFMAN LABORATORY HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Abstract

Because of the nonuniform distribution of earthquake epicenters, a uniform distribution of seismological stations is not necessarily optimal for sampling the Earth in order to determine global Earth structure. Taking into account the already existing digital long-period seismological stations (GDSN, IDA, and GEOSCOPE), we propose a strategy for the siting of additional stations. Here, we shall develop a criterion designed to optimize global resolution of upper mantle structre using mantle wave observations; other kinds of seismological studies will lead to different criteria, which should, however, be amenable to a similar treatment.

For an Earth model developed in spherical harmonics up to a high degree M, and for a given distribution of epicenters and stations, the variance of the solution expanded to some lower degree L less double equals M is obtained at each point of the earth surface by use of averaging kernels, the width of which depends on L. Two measures of the efficiency of an additional station are the reduction of the mean variance and the reduction of the variance oscillations over the Earth's surface; these measures of "new station efficiency" are mapped as a function of the location of the new station (Figures 8 and 9) for the averaging kernels corresponding to L = 8.

Considering the reduction of variance oscillations as the main aim, we find that a new station added in south east Africa, in the eastern Pacific, or in Pakistan is up to 6 times more efficient than a station added randomly, and many times more effective than a station added in the Central United States, the Philippines, or Japan.

Footnotes

* Permanent address: Groupe de Recherche de Géodésie Spatiale, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, 18 rue Edouard Belin, 31055 Toulouse, Cedex, France.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ and D. M. STEINBERG
Optimal configuration of a seismographic network: A statistical approach
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America