Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1985; v. 75; no. 4; p. 905-922
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARD, P.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by TUCKER, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Underground and ridge site effects: A comparison of observation and theory

PIERRE-YVES BARD and BRIAN E. TUCKER

UNIVERSITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE ET MÉDICALE DE GRENOBLE LABORATOIRE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE INTERNE ET TECTONOPHYSIQUE, IRIGM, B.P. 68, 38402 ST. MARTIN D'HERES CEDEX, France
LABORATOIRE CENTRAL DES PONTS ET CHAUSSÉES, 58, BLVD. LEFEBVRE, 75732 PARIS CEDEX 15, France
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, 630 BERCUT DRIVE, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814

Abstract

This paper compares experimental observations and theoretical predictions of the effects of underground and ridge sites on the amplitude of seismic waves.

Observations by Tucker et al. (1984) of narrow-band, earthquake-independent site effects of a factor of 3 at underground sites down to a depth of 40 m can be predicted well using a one-dimensional theoretical model and information about seismic velocity as a function of depth. The observations can be explained as being due to the interference of upcoming, incident, and downgoing, surface-reflected waves within a thin, low-velocity, near-surface layer. An important effect of this layer is to make the interference pattern at shallow depths (i.e., within the layer) insensitive to the incidence angle of the incoming signal and, thus, stable from earthquake to earthquake. Our model suggests that at depths of about 100 m, site effects as great as a factor of 6 would be observed at about 5 Hz, while at much greater depths, site effects would be small. Currently available theoretical techniques are sufficient to assess the expected ground motion at underground sites provided that the velocity profile is known. This is useful for buried pipes, tunnels, and critical storage facilities.

Observations by Tucker et al. (1984) and others of narrow-band, earthquake-independent site effects of about a factor of 8 on ridges cannot be predicted completely using theoretical techniques currently available to us. Accurate predictions could probably be made with a model that included the effects of ridge topography, neighboring topography, and near-surface velocity gradients. Use of such a model, if it were available, would require detailed, expensive knowledge of regional topography and velocity structure. The observed insensitivity of ridge site effects on ridges to incidence angle can, however, be explained with existing theoretical models as being due to a near-surface, low-velocity layer. The size of site effects on ridges and the stability of these effects from earthquake to earthquake suggests that they should be considered when interpreting seismograms obtained from ridge sites and when designing structures, such as communication antennae and power transmission towers, that will be located on mountain ridges. Accurate determination of the site effects of ridges and mountain tops can probably best be done using experimental techniques.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
E. J. Kagan, A. Agnon, M. Bar-Matthews, and A. Ayalon
Dating large infrequent earthquakes by damaged cave deposits
Geology, April 1, 2005; 33(4): 261 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Comparison of Different Site Response Estimation Techniques Using Aftershocks of the 1999 Izmit Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1096 - 1108.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. R. Castro, M. Mucciarelli, F. Pacor, P. Federici, and A. Zaninetti
Determination of the characteristic frequency of two dams located in the region of Calabria, Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1998; 88(2): 503 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Fukushima, J.-C. Gariel, and R. Tanaka
Site-dependent attenuation relations of seismic motion parameters at depth using borehole data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1790 - 1804.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Pedersen, B. Le Brun, D. Hatzfeld, M. Campillo, and P.-Y. Bard
Ground-motion amplitude across ridges
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1786 - 1800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. S. DYSART and J. J. PULLI
Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and the use of trained neural networks
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6B): 1910 - 1933.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. P. JARPE, C. H. CRAMER, B. E. TUCKER, and A. F. SHAKAL
A comparison of observations of ground response to weak and strong ground motion at Coalinga, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 421 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. GELI, P.-Y. BARD, and B. JULLIEN
The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: A review and new results
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 42 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. J. SANCHEZ-SESMA, F. J. CHAVEZ-GARCIA, and M. A. BRAVO
Seismic response of a class of alluvial valleys for incident SH waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 83 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. CELEBI
Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong-motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1147 - 1167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. M. SHEARER and J. A. ORCUTT
Surface and near-surface effects on seismic waves--theory and borehole seismometer results
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1168 - 1196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. DRAVINSKI and T. K. MOSSESSIAN
Scattering of plane harmonic P, SV, and Rayleigh waves by dipping layers of arbitrary shape
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1987; 77(1): 212 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. S. PHILLIPS and K. AKI
Site amplification of coda waves from local earthquakes in central California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1986; 76(3): 627 - 648.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America