Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1986; v. 76; no. 5; p. 1305-1322
© 1986 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLBURN, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by MOONEY, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Two-dimensional velocity structure along the synclinal axis of the Great Valley, California

ROBERT H. COLBURN and WALTER D. MOONEY

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MS 977, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

In 1981 and 1982, the U.S Geological Survey conducted a seismic refraction study of the Great Valley, central California, in order to obtian a better understanding of the deep crustal structure and tectonic evolution of the region. We present the interpretation of a 147-km-long seismic refraction profile recorded along the synclinal axis of the Valley. The northern 98 km of the profile are reversed, whereas the remaining southern portion is unreversed. Observed travel times and amplitudes of primary and secondary arrivals from three shot points have been modeled using two-dimensional ray tracing techniques. The resultant P-wave velocity cross-section consists of a 27-km-thick crust whose isovelocity contours generally rise gently to the southeast. The crust is described in six layers, with average velocities (average layer thickness in parentheses) of 2.8 km/sec (3 km), 4.25 km/sec (3 km), 5.5 km/sec (2 km), 6.1 km/sec (6 km), 6.75 km/sec (6 km), and 7.2 km/sec (7 km). The second through fifth layers are separated by 1-km-thick high gradient transition zone; the lower crustal boundary (6.75/7.2 km/sec) and the Moho (7.2/8.1 km/sec) are modeled with first-order discontinuities. The first layer (Cenozoic sedimentary deposits) is characterized by a velocity gradient of 0.7 km/sec/km starting with a velocity of 1.7 km/sec at the surface. The second layer (4.25 km/sec) consists of the Cretaceous Great Valley Sequence and shows a very modest velocity gradient of 0.2 km/sec/km. The third layer (5.5 km/sec; "basement") may consist of metasedimentary rocks of the Franciscan assemblage, fractured crystalline rocks, or possibly serpentinized ophiolite. The fourth layer (6.1 km/sec) apparently has no velocity equivalent 30 km to the west in the Diablo Range; it and the layer beneath it (6.75 km/sec) may be correlated with the metamorphic and igneous rocks of the eastern foothills of the Sierra Nevada. The basal crustal layer (7.2 km/sec) is evidently mafic igneous rock. An independent interpretation of this profile using the reflectivity method produced a similar model. An interpretation of a parallel profile 10 to 15 km east of our line shows a structure similar to our model below 15 km, but a thinner sedimentary section and velocities as much as 0.9 km/sec faster 6 to 15 km deep. The crustal velocity structure of the central Great Valley is atypical of either continental or oceanic crust, but is consistent with the geologic hypotheses that the Valley is a thickened marginal basin, formed in either a forearc or backarc setting located west of the Mesozoic Sierra Nevadan arc.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. M. Brocher
Compressional and Shear-Wave Velocity versus Depth Relations for Common Rock Types in Northern California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 950 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. M. Brocher, T. M. Brocher, J. McCarthy, P. E. Hart, W. S. Holbrook, K. P. Furlong, T. V. McEvilly, J. A. Hole, and S. L. Klemperer
Seismic Evidence for a Lower-Crustal Detachment Beneath San Francisco Bay, California
Science, September 2, 1994; 265(5177): 1436 - 1439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. H. COLBURN and R. B. HAWMAN
Inversion of slant stacks of deep crustal refraction data from the Great Valley, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2224 - 2247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. MACGREGOR-SCOTT and A. WALTER
Crustal velocities near Coalinga, California, modeled from a combined earthquake/explosion refraction profile
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1475 - 1490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. S. MELTZER, A. R. LEVANDER, and W. D. MOONEY
Upper crustal structure, Livermore Valley and vicinity, California coast ranges
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1655 - 1673.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America