Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1987; v. 77; no. 2; p. 562-578
© 1987 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by BODIN, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Earthquake recurrence models and historical seismicity in the Mexicali-Imperial Valley

JOHN G. ANDERSON and PAUL BODIN

INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS SCRIPPS INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY (A025) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,, SAN DIEGO, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093

Abstract

We have examined the historical seismicity of the Mexicali-Imperial Valley. Since about 1850, the largest observed earthquake in the area has been the magnitude (Mw) 7.1 December 1934 event. The magnitude distribution for large plate-boundary rupturing earthquakes (M > 5.8) is not well fit by the Gutenberg-Richter type (b value) model. Models which better fit the observed magnitude distribution are derived from a lognormal distribution of stress drops on faults of constant size and from an exponential distribution of rupture lengths, as might be expected from randomly distributed rupture-stopping asperities along the length of the fault. This may be among the best data in the world for testing earthquake recurrence models (e.g., time predictability, slip predictability) on a strike-slip fault, but the uncertainties are still too great to permit a unique interpretation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. A. Abrahamson, E. Glowacka, and F. A. Nava
Major earthquakes in Mexicali Valley, Mexico, and fluid extraction at Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. I. DOSER
Historic earthquakes (1918 to 1923) and an assessment of source parameters along the San Jacinto fault system
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1992; 82(4): 1786 - 1801.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. W. HUDNUT and K. E. SIEH
Behavior of the Superstition Hills fault during the past 330 years
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1989; 79(2): 304 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. G. GALANOPOULOS
A new version of earthquake recurrence model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1988; 78(3): 1375 - 1379.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America