Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1988; v. 78; no. 1; p. 230-242
© 1988 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SINGH, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by SUÁREZ, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Regional variation in the number of aftershocks (mb greater double equals 5) of large, subduction-zone earthquakes (Mw greater double equals 7.0)

S. K. SINGH and GERARDO SUÁREZ

INSTITUTO DE GEOFISCIA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO, 04510 MEXICO, D.F. Mexico

Abstract

It is reasonable to expect that the number of aftershocks following a large earthquake should reflect the degree of heterogeneity on and near the fault plane. To investigate this question, we plot N, the number of aftershocks with mb greater double equals 5.0 occurring within the next 30 days after large, subduction-zone, thrust-faulting earthquakes (Mw greater double equals 7.0), versus the magnitude (Mw) of the main shock. Only earthquakes that occurred after the installation of the World-Wide Standard Seismographic Network stations are considered. Because the detection threshold of aftershocks in many regions is greater than mb = 5.0, N is obtained by fitting the data to Gutenberg and Richter's relation (log N = a b · mb). For the same Mw, N varies by a factor of about 40 in different regions. N is less than expected in the eastern Pacific (including Alaska) and is greater than expected in the western Pacific. Relative lack and excess of N correlates well with regions of supposedly strong and weak coupling, respectively. While small and large N also show some correlation with the expansion rate of aftershock area with time, the variation in N is much larger than would be expected from the mere increase of aftershock areas. In some cases, it appears that the number of aftershocks, N, for earthquakes of similar Mw, may also reflect the complexity and enrichment of the P-wave amplitude spectra from 1 to 10 sec. For example, the Valparaiso, Chile, earthquake of 1985 (Mw = 8.0) generated N = 46 earthquakes, whereas for the Michoacán, Mexico, event of 1985 (Mw = 8.1), N is only equal to 5. Furthermore, for the Valparaiso earthquake, P waveforms are much more complex, and the spectra are more energetic at 1 to 10 sec as compared to the 1985 Michoacán event.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Strongly Depth-Dependent Aftershock Production in Deep Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1808 - 1816.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Courboulex, M. A. Santoyo, J. F. Pacheco, and S. K. Singh
The 14 September 1995 (M = 7.3) Copala, Mexico, earthquake: A source study using teleseismic, regional, and local data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1997; 87(4): 999 - 1010.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. K. SINGH, D. COMTE, and M. PARDO
Background seismicity and strength of coupling in the subduction zones
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2114 - 2125.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America