Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SIMPSON, D.W. Articles by SCHOLZ, C.H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Two types of reservoir-induced seismicity

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964

Abstract

The temporal distribution of induced seismicity following the filling of large reservoirs shows two types of response. At some reservoirs, seismicity begins almost immediately following the first filling of the reservoir. At others, pronounced increases in seismicity are not observed until a number of seasonal filling cycles have passed. These differences in response may correspond to two fundamental mechanisms by which a reservoir can modify the strength of the crust—one related to rapid increases in elastic stress due to the load of the reservoir and the other to the more gradual diffusion of water from the reservoir to hypocentral depths. Decreased strength can arise from changes in either elastic stress (decreased normal stress or increased shear stress) or from decreased effective normal stress due to increased pore pressure. Pore pressure at hypocentral depths can rise rapidly, from a coupled elastic response due to compaction of pore space, or more slowly, with the diffusion of water from the surface.

Footnotes

¹ Present address of W. S. Leith: USGS, Reston, Virginia, 22092

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Singh, P. M. Bhattacharya, and R. K. Chadha Seismicity in the Koyna-Warna Reservoir Site in Western India: Fractal and b-Value Mapping Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 476 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Mechanism of Initial Seismicity Following Impoundment of the Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1582 - 1594.

				How faulting keeps the crust strong Geology, May 1, 2000; 28(5): 399 - 402.

				L. W. Wolf, C. A. Rowe, and R. B. Horner Periodic seismicity near Mt. Ogden on the Alaska-British Columbia border: A case for hydrologically triggered earthquakes? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1473 - 1483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Ferreira, R. T. D. Oliveira, M. Assumpcao, J. A. M. Moreira, R. G. Pearce, and M. K. Takeya Correlation of seismicity and water level in the Acu reservoir--an example from Northeast Brazil Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1483 - 1489. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Muir Wood Earthquakes, strain-cycling and the mobilization of fluids Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1994; 78(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Jaume, S. C. Jaume, and L. R. Sykes Changes in State of Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault Resulting from the California Earthquake Sequence of April to June 1992 Science, November 20, 1992; 258(5086): 1325 - 1328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. RAJENDRAN and P. TALWANI The role of elastic, undrained, and drained responses in triggering earthquakes at Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1992; 82(4): 1867 - 1888. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. GRASSO and G. WITTLINGER Ten years of seismic monitoring over a gas field Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1990; 80(2): 450 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]