Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1988; v. 78; no. 6; p. 2077-2088
© 1988 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHAPMAN, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by BOLLINGER, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A procedure for calibrating short-period telemetered seismograph systems

M. C. CHAPMAN, J. A. SNOKE and G. A. BOLLINGER

VIRGINIA TECH SEISMOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24061

Abstract

Efficient low-frequency calibration of the entire seismograph system can be accomplished by Fourier analysis of the system response to automatically generated transient test functions applied to the seismometer calibration coil. Typically, such calibrations are restricted to frequencies less than 10 Hz by the ambient ground motion, system noise, and limited dynamic range. To extend the calibration to a broader frequency range, we disconnect the seismometer and take advantage of the fact that the relative amplitude response of the electronic components in most systems can be measured with high accuracy at frequencies from as low as 0.02 Hz to the Nyquist frequency (e.g., 50 Hz) using standard electronics test equipment. The low-frequency amplitude response of the seismometer can then be isolated by dividing the total system response by that obtained for the electronic components. An iterative least-squares procedure is used to estimate the natural frequency and damping coefficient of the seismometer, along with a scaling parameter that specifies the absolute gain of the system. The phase response of the system is calculated directly from the amplitude response using the Hilbert transform. The procedure assumes that the seismometer is an ideal damped harmonic oscillator and that the system as a whole acts as a minimum phase filter. The only instrumental constants that must be known from independent measurement are the seismometer calibration coil force constant and the inertial mass.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. W. Rodgers, A. J. Martin, M. C. Robertson, M. M. Hsu, and D. B. Harris
Signal-coil calibration of electromagnetic seismometers
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 845 - 850.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. W. Stuart, D. Francis, D. Gubbins, and G. Smith
Tararua broadband array, North Island, New Zealand
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1995; 85(1): 325 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. R. GLEDHILL, M. J. RANDALL, and M. P. CHADWICK
The EARSS digital seismograph: System description and field trials
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1991; 81(4): 1380 - 1390.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Seismological Society of America