Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CROUSE, C. B. Articles by HUSHMAND, B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Soil-structure interaction at CDMG and USGS accelerograph stations

THE EARTH TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 3777 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90807

Abstract

Forced harmonic and impulse-response vibration tests were conducted at several California accelerograph stations operated by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to determine the extent to which soil-structure interaction may be affecting the recorded ground motions. The results of the tests on the foundations comprising USGS Station 6 in the Imperial Valley and CDMG Cholame 1E and Fault Zone 3 stations in the Cholame Valley indicated the presence of highly damped fundamental frequencies between 20 and 40 Hz. However, at the much larger Differential Array station, a masonry-block structure approximately 6 km southwest of Station 6, a moderately damped fundamental frequency of 12 Hz was observed.

Approximate transfer functions between earthquake motions recorded at the stations and the free-field motions were computed from the response data obtained from the forced harmonic vibration tests. For the three smaller stations, these functions showed peak amplification factors ranging from 1.25 to 1.4 at frequencies between 20 and 40 Hz. The amplification at smaller frequencies was insignificant. For the Differential Array station, the amplification factor was 1.5 at 12 Hz and was roughly 0.6 for frequencies between 14 and 25 Hz. These results suggest that soil-structure interaction will have little effect on ground motions recorded at the smaller stations provided that most of the energy in these motions is confined to frequencies less than approximately 20 Hz. However, at the Differential Array station, soil-structure interaction probably has had, and will continue to have, a significant influence on the motions recorded at this station.

Footnotes

^* Present address: Dames and Moore, 500 Market Place Tower, 2025 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Murphy, B. W. Barker, D. D. Sultanov, and O. P. Kuznetsov S-Wave Generation by Underground Explosions: Implications from Observed Frequency-Dependent Source Scaling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 809 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Cultrera, D. M. Boore, W. B. Joyner, and C. M. Dietel Nonlinear soil response in the vicinity of the Van Normal Complex following the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1999; 89(5): 1214 - 1231. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. HARTZELL Site response estimation from earthquake data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1992; 82(6): 2308 - 2327. [Abstract] [PDF]